Well, apparently Biomeg (in the Netherlands??) can access it... it's really annoying.. and they lose business...
------------------------------------------------
CLUB STEPHEN KING (french website about STEPHEN KING, since 1992) : on : Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
------------------------------------------------
My Stephen King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...on-Stockerlone
Non-King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...rlone-Non-King
This edition of INSOMNIA has been signed by both SK and Robin Williams. The auction prominently displays the certificate of authenticity, so I know it's legit.
Dig it.
Who's gonna bite?
In all fairness, Robin Williams did play a role in the movie Insomnia: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0278504/
So this has to be the real thing, right?
Right?
Oh.
Was this movie not based on King's book? Bummer...
But THIS Insomnia Movie with Williams, Pacino, Swank have NOTHING to do with Stephen Kings INSOMNIA book
My Stephen King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...on-Stockerlone
Non-King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...rlone-Non-King
WTF. If you are going to have the balls to fake signatures and then issue a COA, at least have the business sense necessary to realize the film Insomnia has absolutely nothing to do with the Stephen King book by the coincidentally same name. I'm sure Robin Williams, when doing the movie, would not have signed any such book, knowing his film had nothing to do with it. What a load of B.S.
Just become this: I info the seller about his INSOMNIA.
Hallo stockerlone,
Wow after researching this you are right. Thank you for the heads up. I guess thins is a common mistake then. Robin Williams had no problem signing the book. It's still kind of a cool item and I wi;; fix my discription and lower the price a little.
Thanks, Jim - bostonsportscollect-jim
But i think... an ´wrong´ book signed from Williams... is funny...
My Stephen King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...on-Stockerlone
Non-King collection
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...rlone-Non-King
thats hilarious....Hallo stockerlone,
Wow after researching this you are right. Thank you for the heads up. I guess thins is a common mistake then. Robin Williams had no problem signing the book. It's still kind of a cool item and I wi;; fix my discription and lower the price a little
Shouldn't this be signed by Richard Bachman rather than SK?
Also interesting that the "supersize image" is the same small size as the thumbnail.
I don't like it. The entire "Stephen" doesn't look right.
John
Thumbs down.
"Signed" 3x5 card with PSA DNA.
Note the case lists King's name as 'Steven King'.
It's my auction, and I would be glad to get you a better scan. I have been getting Stephen for the past couple of years, and while extremely difficult, he isn't impossible to get on earlier books/different items. No idea why you actually feel it is fake though, you didn't seem to give a legitimate reason.
What doesn't look right? Explain.
Why? Explain.
I find it funny that you guys are self proclaimed "experts," but you don't offer any specific insights to your claims. You are all entitled to your opinions, but I'd expect you guys to actually post something of value if you are going to call out a signature to be fake.
The name looks too squashed. The last name is really a bit off too-- the "g" doesn't look right.
And I'm not calling it a fake. It just doesn't look right to me. I wouldn't even consider buying it.
John
Again, compare this "Stephen" with ANY of the signatures on signed limited books and you'll see there's a BIG difference between the two.
John
Much better scan. Thanks, As I said above. The swoop off the N looks added after.
REAL or NOT it wouldn't sit in my collection. Again, I simply don't like. As you said. We are entitled to our own opinion.
No offense Redsoxfan, but a little politeness wouldn't hurt.
As for recognizing a signature as fake (or real): you seem to be someone who's quite knowledgeable in the field so I'm sure you know that (unless there are blatant and obvious graphological differences with established true sigs such as those found in signed/limited books), it's often a matter of 'it doesn't feel right' without being able to pinpoint what exactly it is that doesn't feel right. Seeing lots of King sigs over the years will help you establish a mental reference image of what it's supposed to look like.