This lady deserves a thread and it would be great to know how you saw her.
How did you like her? Why did she do what she did?
For my part I did love her and it was hard to say goodbye for her. I wish I knew how her life went on after saying goodbye to Roland. What could she say to her husband when she got home..?
I don't think she could continue her ordinary life.
I liked Mrs Tassenbaum. It was great the way she helped Roland. I don't know how she could have went on with her life afterward or what she could possibly tell her husband. I like to think that she had a good life though
I think mabe it would be difficult for her to continue her ordinary life. Maybe she started anew. Though there is a point where your mind becomes oversaturated, so maybe she just forgot it all. Maybe she had to.
I really can't imagine that she stayed with her husband. She needed to start a new life.
You know when I was reading about her I always felt that she had been waiting for something like that (for some kind of unique, burning and life-shocking event) all in her life.
She got it.
Oh, yeah? Maybe her mind forgot, but her heart remembered?
Why do you think she forgot it at all?
I know in King's books it can happen any time but anyway normally people do remember things even if they were shocking. Yeah, we forget some parts and our mind is able to rewrite lots of things in our memory with the time being BUT to forget something as if it had never happened... that's something really rare and hard.
So why should she have forgotten? I am all ears.
Oh, yeah? Maybe her mind forgot, but her heart remembered?
Why do you think she forgot it at all?
I know in King's books it can happen any time but anyway normally people do remember things even if they were shocking. Yeah, we forget some parts and our mind is able to rewrite lots of things in our memory with the time being BUT to forget something as if it had never happened... that's something really rare and hard.
So why should she have forgotten? I am all ears.
Give me a little time? I'm not very far from this now, so I'll read it again and get back to the question.
Cheating on her husband gave me mixed feelings about her. Many times when King writes about adultery, he seems to justify it. I had similar feelings in IT:
Spoiler:
When Bill slept with Beverly. It was hard for me to admire him when the story closed with him riding his bike and trying to wake his wife from her catatonic state.
I get that Roland presented an escape, something exotic, but it doesn't make it right. What if she kept looking for those types of experiences and basically became some kind of whore for all the local walk-ins?
What if she kept looking for those types of experiences and basically became some kind of whore for all the local walk-ins?
An interdimensional hooker.
very funny indeed, especially if you specified what "those types" you mean. Are many rolands around?
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guessed as much. My point (also clear?) is that she wasn't attracted by any features or aspects, but by Roland as a unique human being.
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guessed as much. My point (also clear?) is that she wasn't attracted by any features or aspects, but by Roland as a unique human being.
Either way, I still think of her as a whore and I consider it paradoxical if by Roland, you are pointing to his integrity, when she displays a complete lack thereof. Also, I reread this about a month ago and it was Roland's otherworldliness she seemed most attracted to and little else. I mean, they hardly said two sentences to each other. Also, counter to what you said, there is repeated references to Roland's blue bombardiers eyes and how she wanted to fuck his brains out. What exactly is your point, because it isn't clear to me.
I wouldn't call her a whore by any stretch of the imagination. I agree with Jean that she was uniquely attracted to Roland.
In Irene's case, I think she was a deeply disatisfied lady - but within her own sheltered and ordered life, an opportunity never arose for her to express it.
She ended up sleeping with Roland partly through desire but more because of the unreality of the situation - it was as if it wasn't really her, the married Irene Tassenbaum, it was an Irene that she could have been.
I can justify what she did, is what I'm saying. I don't think relationships are ever that straightforward that all infidelity can be instantly struck off as "bad behaviour".
It might not necessarily have spelt the end of her marriage. It might have given her the motivation to return to it with a more assertive view on what she wanted from her relationahip with her husband - her experience might have enabled her to rekindle the passion and spontaenity(sp?) between them.
If she were honest enough to tell her husband, perhaps he could be compassionate enough to forgive her.
Hopefully, but forgiveness doesn't mean the absence of consequence.
Of course not, but the consequence doesn't have to be the dissolution of the marriage.
No it doesn't, you're right. That's why I spoke subjectively. It is my opinion on the matter and my impression of Mrs. T. I felt similarly about her and the situation as I did Bill and Beverly in IT. I hated that King threw that into IT, because I had already spent several hundred pages really digging Bill. It was really hard for me to latch onto that epilogue, it just seemed so out of place to me. Part of the reason for the tone of my posts is that the thread was presented as a love fest for Mrs T. For me, adultery, is the giant pink elephant and I don't think it should be ignored.
Let this be the last word on the matter if that's cool. I don't want to start arguing about marriage and adultery and etc... I thought about erasing my post, but it would make a few others seem out of place.
I'm not going to apologize for believing adultery is wrong and anything but "justified," but I don't want to argue it anymore.
this has nothing to do with adultery or anything like that.
i just thought that she was also offering the only kind of comfort that she thought roland would take after his loss. sometimes sex is a kind of comfort - especially for someone like roland i think.