Re the balance discussion, what is the “balance” that anakin was prophesied to bring? If it was the rule of 2 then yeah I guess he did. But if it was about power, I don’t think he did. Palpatine was very strong and joining him certainly didn’t even out any balance of power, IMO, especially after killing all the younglings.
Spoiler
Wanted
CD Carrie Portfolio 719
Dark Tower S/N LE's 171 or 203
ANY Stephen King S/N LE #171 or 719
A Storm of Swords #218 or 346
Ancillary Justice #455
American Gods (+ SC Reader copy) #624
Michael Whelan original art
DT VII: Michael Whelan Remarque
Like Counter Culture Shock on Facebook
George Lucas is notorious for making dumbass decisions. He wanted to make a character in a Lucas arts video game named Darth icky or darth insanius. The story is pretty wild.
https://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...ostPageIndex=2
Maybe it shouldn’t be that surprising given the changes he made to the original trilogy with his special editions
LOL Yeah, he's a dumbass with your money and like 10-11 zero's after his name on his tax return. LOL You've got to remember they are HIS movies, etc. not yours. You don't like what he does, don't support him. However, as much as everyone bitch's about him they all spend their money. LOL Oh, and SPEND they do!!!! LOL
Personally, I love most of what he produced and say thanks for giving us this franchise.
EDIT: Oh, except for, Mattrick. He's excluded from the above. He doesn't like or support him and most other big money franchises. He'll likely take exception to this statement as well.
For what it’s worth I’m not bashing Star Wars, I’m bashing Lucas. I get wanting to update some of the visuals to match his vision but there was no need to make it so Han didn’t shoot Greedo first or add the No! scream from Vader in Jedi or change the Max Rebo band in jabbas layer. He got way into the weeds with his changes.
Well, I hear what you're saying, but Lucas created Star Wars so the two are quite entwined. As far as the changes go, they fit his vision of the story. And it was his story to tell and he has the right to tell it as he see's it. You either agree or don't I suppose. That is up to you, but it is what it is and no amount of, bashing or griping is going to change that well, except possibly for, Disney!!! lol Now it's THEIR story. lol
It could be deeper in that Luke was the chosen one. Anakin reduced the Jedi down to two, but then Luke was the only one left standing at the end of Jedi (I'm not including Episode 9 retroactive survival of Palpatine here, since Lucas didn't envision that). Luke was not technically a Jedi, not like the old Jedi whom, as the prequels tell us, received extremely extensive training, but he was a Jedi in idea (he was more of an actual Jedi before Lucas changed the definition of what a Jedi is with the prequels). If Luke being the last with no true Jedi or Sith, then the force would be balanced. You cold even argue Luke threw the force out of balance by attempting to revive the Jedi...but then they had to bring The Emperor Back which throws that whole idea out the window.
Originally Posted by Merlin1958
I take exception with you being patently incorrect with a narrow view of who I am. I grew up on Star Wars and Indiana Jones. I like George Lucas quite a lot, actually, even if the prequels were a product of him being allowed to be totally unchecked as a filmmaker. He's a great storyteller when it comes to concepts, but he's not a great script writer or director. He should be a producer and lay out a basic story and let someone else write it, like he did with Lawrence Kasdan with Empire and Jedi.
As for not supporting big money franchises, that is also incorrect. Just because some big money franchises don't interest me at all (Harry Potter, Fast and the Furious, DC comics, Disney Wars, Transformers) doesn't mean I don't support big money franchises I do like. I saw John Wick 2 and 3. I've seen every Mission Impossible movie in theatres. I saw the last two Jurassic Worlds in theatres. I've seen every Toy Story movie in theatres. I saw Incredibles 2. I've seen almost every Bond film in theatres since Goldeneye. I saw every X-Men movie in theatres except for the last two for no reason than I wanted to see other movies more...I even saw X-Men Origins Wolverine...oof. I even saw Joker despite my lack of interest in anything DC Comics since The Dark Knight Rises. I've went to see nearly half the MCU movies since 2014. So the idea that I scoff at big money franchises just because I don't like Star Wars is completely incorrect. Imagine paying to see films you know you will like and not paying for films you know you won't like...what a concept!
Like Counter Culture Shock on Facebook
I deliberately stayed away from this thread, because I didn’t want any episode nine spoilers. Looking back on some of the posts here maybe it’s best that I did . Anyway I saw episode nine tonight, so here I am - although not to talk about episode nine.
Over the last couple of nights I watched episode seven and eight again, just to refresh my memory and see if I had a different take on them on re-watching. Watching the force awakens, I had a blast. Yes, it has a lot in common with episode four, and it’s far from flawless, but it feels like a Star Wars movie. And not just in a superficial way - like there are TIE fighters and the millennium falcon and X-wings and stuff - but the way the characters interacted and the themes of the movie were what made it a fun watch. Characters that I like, having space adventures, but with danger and real stakes.
Episode eight is still a mixed bag for me, but I will say that I think it improved on a rewatch. It’s a very different tone from the first movie of course, and it has problems with tone generally, but I think it has a lot to offer once I got past some of the basic premises of the film that I rejected on the first viewing. The whole Finn and Rose plot is still a waste of time, of course, and the theme of “don’t be a hero just follow orders” is still there, but I was more accepting of the Rey and Luke plot thread this time around. Dare I say it, I think it may have been the strongest part of those two movies for me.
In fact, I think these two movies work better as a standalone start of a trilogy, then as a continuation of episodes four five and six. If we didn’t have preconceptions about what Luke should be like, The last Jedi works much better. If the empire wasn’t defeated at the end of return of the Jedi, then you don’t need to explain where the first order or Snoke came from. If the previous films didn’t exist, then our expectations about who Rey’s parents might’ve been don’t exist, and so the whole reveal – or non-reveal - of who they are in the last Jedi isn’t such a letdown. Having the old characters there I think does a disservice to the new trilogy, because it raises questions about how the new characters fit in, and how we got here from the old movies. The new movies work much better when they don’t have all that baggage to carry.
As for the whole issue of Rey being a Mary Sue, I can see what people mean, but honestly it doesn’t bother me at all. I like the character. I’d like that she’s trying to figure out who she is, when she has no parents or memory of parents to draw from. I’m willing to forgive her seemingly miraculous Powers, because she still struggles, and I care enough about her to want her to succeed. That to me is what makes a good movie – that I’m invested in the characters.
“If you don't know what you want," the doorman said, "you end up with a lot you don't.”
― Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
Looking for SubPress Lettered::
Angel's Game and Prisoner of Heaven (Zafon)
Ilium (Simmons)
I believe Lucas has specifically stated that that isn’t what “bringing balance to the force” means. I’ll try to find a reference for that.
If the two Sith are ruling over the galaxy by force and oppression, and the two Jedi are hiding on remote planets in secret, that’s hardly balance. I believe what Lucas intended was that balance of the force was achieved through Luke. Luke balances the Dark side of the force through his Vader heritage, but turned to the light side to become a Jedi. Vader achieved that by both fathering Luke, but also killing the Emperor and saving Luke.
“If you don't know what you want," the doorman said, "you end up with a lot you don't.”
― Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
Looking for SubPress Lettered::
Angel's Game and Prisoner of Heaven (Zafon)
Ilium (Simmons)
You know, your post made me think of an older show that demonstrated a similar theory/belief called "Carnivale". I don't remember the entire mythology but it dealt with a "Creature of Light" and a "Creature of Darkness" being born into every generation. It was apretty good show that got canned early by HBO despite quite a grass roots campaign.Anyway, it reminds me a lot of what you are referring to in the Sith/Jedi dichotomy and "balance to the Force". At it's core it comes down to in order for there to be balance there must be a light and a dark, good and evil, etc.
While I get those explanations I tend to be of the belief that there was never "balance" in the force in the movies. For me at least there has to be Jedi and Sith on equal footing so to speak for there to be "balance". But maybe "balance" isn't what the universe needs. For "good" to prevail, the force needs to be un-balanced. It's kinda like Lucas didn't really think the whole "Chosen One" thing through... How he was creating an idea of "Ying and Yang" but not really executing that idea in a way that made sense. At the end of the day though, it's Star Wars, it's big, it's dumb, and it's full of contradictions and revisionist history (so to speak). As far as the movies go, it's really not all that deep.
https://bleedingfool.com/blogs/is-ro...udience-score/
Possible rigging of the rotten tomatoes audience score.
Never heard of that news source.
I found Episode IX to be terrible....from the worst opening scroll of the 9 movies to the cringeworthy last line of dialogue and there was a ton of just terrible dailogue and humor that didn't work. The only main character that I cared about through the new trilogy was Kylo Ren and he was the only redeeming quality I found in Rise of the Skywalker. For the people who liked/loved it, I'm happy it could still be Star Wars for you. At least I have The Mandalorian.
JJ also had to get his overused lens flares in the movie...even though they were a tad more "subtle".
Ep 9 comments:
Spoiler:
“If you don't know what you want," the doorman said, "you end up with a lot you don't.”
― Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
Looking for SubPress Lettered::
Angel's Game and Prisoner of Heaven (Zafon)
Ilium (Simmons)
For the second one, Perhaps not so much wrong as unnecessary. I get what they were going for, and I could see that it makes sense in the context of the movie, but it seemed to be pandering to fans in a way that didn’t really work for me.
BIG SPOILER:
Spoiler:
“If you don't know what you want," the doorman said, "you end up with a lot you don't.”
― Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
Looking for SubPress Lettered::
Angel's Game and Prisoner of Heaven (Zafon)
Ilium (Simmons)
Uhhhhh...
Spoiler:
Wanted
CD Carrie Portfolio 719
Dark Tower S/N LE's 171 or 203
ANY Stephen King S/N LE #171 or 719
A Storm of Swords #218 or 346
Ancillary Justice #455
American Gods (+ SC Reader copy) #624
Michael Whelan original art
DT VII: Michael Whelan Remarque