Rage, 1977
Please vote for Rage using the following scale:
- 5
- 4.5
- 4
- 3.5
- 3
- 2.5
- 2
- 1
- 0
- Never read
If you haven't read this book yet, please vote Never Read. Feel free to discuss your votes in this thread.
Bracket #1: Rage (1977)
Rage, 1977
Please vote for Rage using the following scale:
- 5
- 4.5
- 4
- 3.5
- 3
- 2.5
- 2
- 1
- 0
- Never read
If you haven't read this book yet, please vote Never Read. Feel free to discuss your votes in this thread.
1
not a zero only because it's a King and I have to pay him some respect. Otherwise, total crap.
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
3.
It was alright.
I actually liked it. But you can tell the author at the time was immature and the story is a bit rough around the edges. Went with 3.5.
Try-hard edgy angst.
2...he tried.
All that's left of what we were is what we have become.
4 for me. A decent story that kept me really interested until the end!
The poll has closed. Rage has earned a FAS (final average score) of 3.204545455 or 64.09%. It received a rating of 3.5 with 7 votes.
Bears's review infuriates Stebbins.Originally Posted by Jean
stebbins' penchant for liking this book has always bewildered bears
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it's good to have opposing opinions, even if one of them is wrong
"A real limited edition, far from being an expensive autograph stapled to a novel, is a treasure. And like all treasures do, it transforms the responsible owner into a caretaker, and being a caretaker of something as fragile and easily destroyed as ideas and images is not a bad thing but a good one...and so is the re-evaluation of what books are and what they do that necessarily follows." - Stephen King
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
