Search:

I agree with Monte, about the advice to read the original. I prefer the original, but either way, I think if you can get a copy of the original it's worth a read. You may still prefer the revised,...

Excellent points DinosaurSr (great name too).

Original. I agree with Brice, just pretend it never was revised.

it's the Calla-speak that most seems forced to me. I'll grant that if you'd never read the series and started with the revised it wouldn't be noticeable, but if, like many of us, you read the...

i think whether they were necessary is subjective. it seems for the most part the attempted purpose of the revisions is to make the first book more cohesive with the rest of them, particularly the...

good point indeed monte. it makes the revised fit a little better. i still like the original, but i too have read the revised right after DT-7 and it works well there.

agreed, it's his story, and i'd love to have the audiobooks i don't have that king recorded [though i am glad that if i only have one, it's Drawing of the Three].

oh i like guidall do, i just think i prefer muller bc i started with muller. i think guidall does a great roland, and i hated the way muller did the accents in mejis [it sounded like appalachia]

i can understand some people's aversion to dylan's voice. i don't share it. i love hearing dylan sing his songs. of course my fav singer is tom waits so there you go...

i agree, it's akin to hearing a songwriter perform their own song regardless of how well they sing [eg, dylan or hunter]. hearing king tell his own story is very cool.

same here, i have king doing drawing of the three and that is fucking cool to hear the author himself like my douglas adams' books.

so would i monte! no offense to guidall, but i prefer muller. guidall does a nice job finishing up the series though.

I prefer the original. I read it so many times in that form that to me it rings as the "truer" one. Sure, it leaves a bit more up to speculation, but that's what I like about the series. If all my...