Search:

https://twitter.com/StephenKing/status/1759714455921844348?s=20[/QUOTE]

Frustrating that WB won't release the movie.[/QUOTE]

Careful what you wish for. This is likely to be unwatchable. ...

https://twitter.com/StephenKing/status/1759714455921844348?s=20[/QUOTE]

Frustrating that WB won't release the movie.

I hope not.

A vampire movie without the vampire. Now that's a novel approach.

Not really true. Reports are that it only had one test screening with unfinished visual effects and tested as well as the first It movie, which went on to make over $700 million, or their upcoming...

Batgirl was mothballed because of poor test screen results. I wonder if SL was tested as well. Very disappointing.

[/QUOTE]

That's unfortunate. The story begins on September the 5th so a September 9th opening would have been perfect timing.

Still no trailer.

See my 4/25/22 post. That format would afford the time necessary to fully develop the characters and the slow burn atmosphere that makes SL such a good book.

It is obviously too late to change the format but it would have been interesting to seen this done as a three part mini-series, the film caliber of Hulu's Castle Rock, with each part named the same...

Thankfully it appears that the movie will be set in the 70s...

http://www.thedarktower.org/gallery/data/500/1763ae53-1c24-4129-bc61-514c6260ca1c-LOC_140_Club_1.JPG
...

Seems a bit of a stretch. In the novel Dr. Cody is in his mid-thirties. Ms. Woodard is approaching 70. Hopefully this doesn't portend more deviations from the original story. We've already seen that...

Would love to see them maintain the timeframe (mid-70s, no cell phone etc), film the movie in and around Durham and Lisbon Falls and use original model and inspiration for the Marsten House...
...