No good, IMO.
Type: Posts; User: idlewarnings
No good, IMO.
i think The Stand is good. The rest are crap.
The BOB is good.
The signed IT from Hyraxia is not good.
No good
I don't like the middle signature.
We provide our own COA, which I acknowledge is only worth the reputation of our business. On top of that, we guarantee it will pass any third party authentication company such as PSA or JSA. I am...
I think it's rushed and ugly but authentic.
Unfortunately, I think 3, 4 and 5 were done by the same person and are all phony. 6 is the only one I have any hope for. Curious to see what others think.
I DO NOT like that 'Stephen King' signature one bit. It's full of pen lifts and hesitations. To me, it screams fake! :nope:
It also looks like the seller has scrubbed out the previous owner's name...
At one point she had two different signed books listed (they weren't both FKs) that had IDENTICAL signatures. She's reproducing signatures some how or photoshopping her listings. I reported her...
I think Bag of Bones is okay. Rose Madder is bad.
There's something relaxed and...feminine (for a lack of a better word) that bothers me about that IT signature. It's missing that spiky verticality that you usually see in his signature from this...
I don't like it at all.
Looks good to me.
Agree. Signatures look identical.[/QUOTE]
Using black ink when a little research would show all the others signatures from that signing are in blue ink is just dumb. To reproduce two identical...
I think it's good.
I don't like this one either. Looks like it was signed by a secretary if you ask me.
I don't like this one at all. It's both too short and too wide. I wouldn't have it in my collection.
This one's been discussed before. Go back to post #7348. The consensus was that it's genuine. He's knocked $100 off the price since the last listing.
Someone got screwed. I called BS on that one last week.