Well if it's about who's the best director at the present moment, then Hitchcock is ineligible. And still, I don't think Nolan presently is the best anyway. Again, my opinion.
Type: Posts; User: mae
Well if it's about who's the best director at the...
Well if it's about who's the best director at the present moment, then Hitchcock is ineligible. And still, I don't think Nolan presently is the best anyway. Again, my opinion.
Sure, why would I mind. And I meant it, too!
I'm glad we agree on this, Jean, because when one is in agreement with bears one is always correct :dance:[/QUOTE]
do you mind if I sig this after Halloween?
::flattered beyond words::[/QUOTE]
...
I'm glad we agree on this, Jean, because when one...
I'm glad we agree on this, Jean, because when one is in agreement with bears one is always correct :dance:
Well, I'm sorry then, because I approached this...
Well, I'm sorry then, because I approached this as a cinephile, weighing each candidate against the entirety of world cinema. For me Nolan wouldn't rate anywhere in the top 30 or so, maybe even top...
How is this even possible? Nolan? Greatest...
How is this even possible? Nolan? Greatest director? Maybe in another decade or two when we can objectively judge his work. Hitchcock all the way. Kubrick should've been second.