Yes, I'd have to agree it's dangerous agreeing with me on anything. :lol: I try not to do so myself.
Type: Posts; User: Brice
Yes, I'd have to agree it's dangerous agreeing with me on anything. :lol: I try not to do so myself.
I actually gave my tv away. :)
I don't watch tv.
To see? There is a movie? How did I not know this? :(
I think most of the people in Burger King would prefer it if I didn't. :rofl:
I doubt that will help.
Actually, I am going to expound on the idea, but it isn't a fully formed idea and now is not the time because I'm tired and not capable of deeper thoughts. :)
no
Well, thats another topic.[/QUOTE]
Meh...it's all one topic really. :P
Okey dokey smokey! If what I just said wasn't what you were talking about, what were you talking about?
...and I don't think the rose was the tower's twin. I think it actually was the tower.
So you think it was a foreshadowing of him finding The Rose in the lot, the Rose being the twin of the Dark Tower, and so also represents the multiverse it in its own way, and thats it?[/QUOTE]
...
Thats an interesting perspective, Brice. It just seemed an unresolved thing that seemed key towards the beginning of the series.[/QUOTE]
I don't think it's unresolved. I think it was...
Well, I don't think it was really just dropped. I think it was no longer needed. The blade of grass was meant to illustrate size in the multiverse so Roland could further understand what he was...