Do you feel that King was implying that Black 13's placement in the lock box under the Twin Towers caused the 9-11 attacks? Also, do you feel that it was destroyed in the attacks?
Thoughts?
Printable View
Do you feel that King was implying that Black 13's placement in the lock box under the Twin Towers caused the 9-11 attacks? Also, do you feel that it was destroyed in the attacks?
Thoughts?
I think he was just trying to tie in a dark event with a dark object. On the note of whether or not it was destroyed, the balls we're fragile, but 13 had powerful magic. It could have escaped, but if it didn't, it was most certainly destroyed.
Maybe he was trying to say that the jihadists were actually of The White and crashed those planes to try to destroy Black 13....? :unsure:
No, I really don't believe that.
I think he was probably trying to make the connection that evil draws more evil and in that sense Black 13 was a contributor to the Towers falling.
What about the posters in the New York/ Fedic tunnel. Does that mean that people went to see the towers fall before Black 13 was placed underneath? In this sense, it was just coincidence, mayhap a fitting one, but leaves little causation to Black 13.
Damn, that is a good point jude. I forgot about those posters advertising their destruction. Then again, nobody knew Black 13 was there so they could advertise it anyway....not knowing they were destroying something evil like them. :)
That was a good question. My point of view on that is, that the Great Old Ones were viewing various time flows back in their heyday so there is no "before or after" for them, they just chose which event to go see and did so.
So, what comes first, the poster or Black 13? I'm going to be thinking about this all day. I got the feeling that the posters were very old, and people witnessed 9/11 quite a few times. Another question, how could events in the Keystone world be witnessed before they transpired- with the whole "time only moves forward" thing.
I agree with that, CK. :thumbsup:
CK, very interesting. I posted before I read that. I still have a few issues, see above.
Okay, care to elaborate sir? Why is it only a theory, and if it is only a theory, DT7Spoiler: 03-26-2008 08:22 PMWuducynnQuote:How was it proven as a fact?Spoiler: 03-26-2008 08:44 PMobscurejudeI just read the section last night, and that's what the narrator says,
Spoiler:DTVII Hardcover 453-454
Is this proof enough? 03-26-2008 08:49 PMWuducynnQuote:That narration is coming from Roland's perspective, his belief. 03-26-2008 09:09 PMobscurejudeCK, I usually have no problem following you, but I'm really lost. Is there a thread or something where the "theory" has been discussed? 03-26-2008 10:09 PMJeanfully agree with Matthew here. It's like ka. We accept that it exists within the context of the novel only because Roland or someone else believes so. It's a peculiar case of readers' naiveté. Much the same way we could believe that whippoorwill augured death because Tom Saywer thinks so. There is a context of described beliefs, and a context of described reality; sometimes they are hard to differ (sometimes hardly possible), especially when the reality described is a world that has moved on, and all cultural contexts are confused. 03-26-2008 10:14 PMobscurejudeWhat about the Tet's whole preoccupation with getting to the Keystone world beforeSpoiler:Which aspect is "peculiar" Jean. I'd just like to follow you a little better, I understand what you are saying in terms of literary prose, but I'm not sure if I understand how it specifically applies here. Do you kennit? 03-26-2008 10:25 PMJeanYes. I don't even know whether or not they were right in believing that time went only one way there, andSpoiler:, and all that - but along with Matthew I don't think we have enough conclusive proof. My main point was that TDT is complex enough for us to have to [at least try to] discriminate between the reality (as described there) from the lore, mythology, superstitions, and false beliefs (as described there). 03-27-2008 02:29 AMLettiHey fellas, try to be a bit more careful with the spoilers, please. It's not a spoiler thread but I have seen them everywhere. 03-27-2008 04:37 AMjaysonQuote:Spoiler:
i agree with you and jean. like i've said many times before, i think the reader can often confuse what the characters [especially Roland] believe to be the metaphysical "rules" of the world with the way things actually work. we never received any info about time only going one way from anyone more authoritative than a character, or the narrator on a character's thoughts. they took it as a hard and fast rule, but that doesn't make it true.
however if it is true that time only goes fwd in that world, there are some issues which would be confusing, if not contradictory. 03-27-2008 08:40 AMobscurejudeI'm really surprised that I never thought about this particularly issue in this light. Thank you Jean, for the suggestions.
So what makes the "keystone" world keystone? 03-27-2008 08:43 AMjayson 03-27-2008 08:47 AMobscurejudeThere's a passing comment that is bothersome to me in DT VII, "this is the only world which anything matters, at least in some significant way" I guess its just more reader naivete, but this is really bothering me. Its the difference between co-op city and Brooklyn. This is empirical evidence (at least within the tale). Clear disparity between realities.
Sorry to derail the conversation Mathew. Do I need to start another thread? 03-27-2008 08:53 AMDaghainI actually thought it was really clever of King to leave Black Thirteen in the Twin Towers. I took it to mean they would be destroyed when the towers came down.
And jude, that would probably be a really good thread to start. :) 03-27-2008 08:54 AMobscurejudeBe on the lookout for a new thread.