Several choices. Feel free to comment, but please vote.
Several choices. Feel free to comment, but please vote.
Have him sign (and doodle) every book in the collection, take pictures - then put him in the basement along with Glenn and Rachel ??? :P
Thanks, Hon...... I told you that would work.... Get those sigs?
I'm sure he'll be exhausted so I'm going straight to the kitchen, making him a sandwich, stacking my collection on the table so he has plenty to sign while he dines. I'm going outside and get his signed car registration and anything else he has signed in his car and bringing it in and listing it on ebay. When he gets done with the pile of books, I'm going to show him his phone number on the car registration and then we start talking Tabitha and my new found ability to get as many signed books as I want, then I'm walking them both to the door and giving them good riddance. Next I'm taking pictures of his signatures and, depending on his demeanor, I'll start posting pictures of his signatures on DT.org and labeling them as possibly - rushed, scared, hurried, relaxed, exhausted or some other state we will be able to reference when comparing his signatures to possible imitations!!!!! Then I'm starting two threads: "You Won't Believe What Happened To Me Today" and "PM Me If You Need A Book Signed"
Get a really good lawyer. LOL
Secure permission to publish limited editions of Second Coming, Sword In The Darkness, and The Cannibals!
I'd have to ask whether the titles (particularly the first two, although the third comes into play at a stretch) were selected wholly at random or in direct context of the original question :emot-roflolmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Mears
Good catch. I'm embarrassed to say I didn't even consider that double entendre of the titles in relation to the question. The sad fact of the matter is that I submitted limited edition proposals to SK for the titles mentioned and was rejected on all three. Talk about tunnel vision!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad PennyI'd have to ask whether the titles (particularly the first two, although the third comes into play at a stretch) were selected wholly at random or in direct context of the original question :emot-roflolmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Mears
Fair enough mate - and, personally speaking, I think the three you choose would be ball-tearing (yep, a good thing here in Australia) trio indeed !!! :smile:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben MearsGood catch. I'm embarrassed to say I didn't even consider that double entendre of the titles in relation to the question. The sad fact of the matter is that I submitted limited edition proposals to SK for the titles mentioned and was rejected on all three. Talk about tunnel vision!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad PennyI'd have to ask whether the titles (particularly the first two, although the third comes into play at a stretch) were selected wholly at random or in direct context of the original question :emot-roflolmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Mears
:clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad PennyI'd have to ask whether the titles (particularly the first two, although the third comes into play at a stretch) were selected wholly at random or in direct context of the original question :emot-roflolmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Mears