I am interested in your feelings about him.
Did you like him? Have you ever felt sorry for him ever?
Printable View
I am interested in your feelings about him.
Did you like him? Have you ever felt sorry for him ever?
I didn't like him, which, IMHO, makes him a good villain. :D
He was a failed gunslinger who thought he was a bigshot, and I loved that he got his in the end.
perfectly stated http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k2.../0134-bear.gif
I didn't care for the man, nor did he have my sympathy. He choose the path of evil, and thats that
He was a horrible punk-ass, I hate him. Great villain! So ultimately, yes I like him. ;)
You're all just bigoted against the crippled.
:lol:
OMG :lol: Didn't see that one coming!
leave it to CK
Anyway I opened this poll because usually I don't like villians. I am not interested in them, either.
But I liked Jonas and his character and I really am interested in his past. How he got those horrible scars. Stuff like that. http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p...iley/shrug.gif
Jonas was a very enigmatic character for sure. I would also love to hear some of his history as long as it isn't cobbled together for the sake of another story.
The man had to die of course, I am glad it was Roland that handled him.
I feel sorry for how the failed 'slingers were sent west. In the end, that was a major problem for Gilead so maybe they could have come up with a different means of dealing with the people who failed.
But Jonas? No. To me, he was born a villian.
It was their major problem, but they could never have come up with any different solution, considering the status of gunslingers in their society. The elite was absolute, semi-god-like; the very attempt to join it had to be non-compromising. You win all, or you lose all, no golden middle here. You join that caste of supermen, or you are cast away.
Well put Jean, Said much better than I could have done
I think life is full of situations when there is no golden middle. That's one of the main reasons for the fact that life can be very hard. Not because people wouldn't like to have one but because there simply isn't.
I don't say that gunslinging is one of these things but we must see that golden middle is not always a way.
I agree, some things are absolute. There are benefits but also very harsh drawbacks to those situations.
Maybe if you failed the Gunslinger test you could still be a cook or something?
And btw...do you guys think Suze was the first female gunslinger? Is that mentioned anywhere?
:orely:???
I think she is. Somewhere Roland thinks to himself that he never would have believed the gunslinger's creed would be said by a woman.
And, potential gunslingers didn't HAVE to take the test. They could slink away quietly and become landowners or members of court or whatever. So they did actually have some kind of choice.
I think it shame itself was so big too that without sending them west most of them wouldn't have been able to stay.
I agree, I think that even though there was a "choice". Being a Gunslinger that never took the test would be too shameful.
i do like him. i never really thought about that question before. i pity him more, though.
i can't help but feel that roland and jonas could be interchangable...had roland been sent west, would he be much different than jonas became? if jonas had bested fardo, would he have become the same kind of gunslinger roland did? (am i making any sense?)
See, I don't see it that way at all. I see Jonas as evil, so of course he failed his test. I see Roland as good, so of course he passed his. :D