Gerald's Game FTW! Yeah, right!? Right!?
Oh ... just me.
Gerald's Game FTW! Yeah, right!? Right!?
Oh ... just me.
Did you forget about me?Originally Posted by Shannon
Gerald's Game FTW! Yeah, right!? Right!?
Oh ... just me.
Only the gentle are ever really strong.
Nope, I officially bar you from the Gerald's Game fan club because you mentioned above that you would put Wizard And Glass near the bottom of your King favorites list. That is crazy talk and I don't want you to spread your crazy on me.
I never understood all the Insomnia and Rose Madder hate. It's a good thing I joined this forum to discuss the books, not their contents
now bears are puzzled...<...> It's a good thing I joined this forum to discuss the books, not their contents
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I joined TDT.org to discuss collectible King books, not to discuss what the man wrote. I'm a scientist and pretty 'cerebral' in many ways, but I don't like to overanalyze the feelings that 'art' (in all its many forms) evokes in me. This probably sounds a little weird, but hey...
Buh... If you don't WANT to understand how others feel about it, why do you bother even to tell us how you feel about it?I never understood all the Insomnia and Rose Madder hate. It's a good thing I joined this forum to discuss the books, not their contentsExcellent! Divide and conquer! Bwa-HAHaha!!!Nope, I officially bar you from the Gerald's Game fan club because you mentioned above that you would put Wizard And Glass near the bottom of your King favorites list. That is crazy talk and I don't want you to spread your crazy on me.Did you forget about me?Gerald's Game FTW! Yeah, right!? Right!?
Oh ... just me.
Gerald's Game = FAIL
I think they just ranked the books they read and filled in the blanks with the books they hadn't.
Silliy! Athough he is not interested in discussion for the most part he understands other's desire to discuss such things. To prove the point you are discussing his lack of interest in discussion.Buh... If you don't WANT to understand how others feel about it, why do you bother even to tell us how you feel about it?I never understood all the Insomnia and Rose Madder hate. It's a good thing I joined this forum to discuss the books, not their contents]
Seriously he only said that wasn't his reason for joining (as a collector that's a valid point). He didn't say he was totally opposed to discussing the contents. In fact he was using his primary motivation only to illuminate the lack of love for certain books that he does like.
Spot on, Brice!
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I really should get around to reading "On Writing." But, like, moreso now. Apparently.
On Writing is the only King book that I have ever started and not finished. I guess that means it would not be towards the top of my personal list. I do intend to try it again but I am not sure that it will be soon.
As for Rose Madder, I am not even really sure why I didn't like it. I simply didn't. I however would not have put Insomnia so low.
Maybe we should each do our own list and post them. (I would have to exclude some since I have not read King's entire catalog.)
Last edited by RUBE; 04-30-2012 at 07:41 PM. Reason: Whoops. A thread for listing King books already exists.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
