*hints at "fiction"* - but yeah i got it now, what you mean at least In this case it depends from a view to life if i think about it like that then yeh it would be absurd without him but i don't think about it like you i guess
*hints at "fiction"* - but yeah i got it now, what you mean at least In this case it depends from a view to life if i think about it like that then yeh it would be absurd without him but i don't think about it like you i guess
but then, as I suggested before, you must be equally dissatisfied with other references (Seven Samurai, Wizard of Oz, etc), as well as the origin of Roland himself as Browning's Childe Roland?
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry if this doesn't seem related to King being in SOS, but one thing bugged me about it. Eddie's on a mission in the book to learn where Co-op City is, Brooklyn or the Bronx. Aaron tells Eddie that Co-op City is in the Bronx, always has been. Eddie asks King where it is and he says it's in Brooklyn, same as the world where Eddie is from...1984 is it?...This is July 9, 1977. Does King say that cause he's confused? Is this a mind trap? This world that Eddie and Roland are visiting at the time is the key world, we get there in SOS and in the next book, so what gives?
I really liked Kings role in SOS. To me, it was just another little twist to get a smile out of me. And make me want to keep reading just to see what exactly what piece of the puzzle he was playing.
In King's fantasy land. I believe Roland already existed. And the Character of King just helps out with his part of Ka.
When King first wrote about himself as some author of Salem's Lot I really didn't expect there be a continuation and he'll put himself in person into the books. So, when Roland and Eddie decided to go and see him it was a real twist! But truely a good one. I mean it was one of the things I really liked in SoS.
But at the same time I can't still decide how I feel about it. I mean wether King made up the Roland's world and the characters or they already existed. I finished the book just yesterday, so I need to think it over again
Agree 100% I was actually pissed off that he would do that. It felt to me like it was a narcistic thing. Roland and Eddie calling Stephen King a GOD?! Comon man...Now reading it more it makes a little more sense. TBH i'd rather it not have happened at all. But considering Pere, and Flagg, and everything else...it makes sense.
The more I read and think about it, the less it appeals to me. I need to find that picture of him in SOS and write "metafiction fail" underneath.
Thanks Brice. I had a really hard time finding that online for some reason. Couldn't seem to come up with the right search tags.
I didn't use search tags. I just know where all the art from the books is online. It was my pleasure to help.
Oh thank you, Brice. The nice thing is that I have this pic in my SOS but somehow I forgot tha it's sai King.
silly me
Roland would have understood.
After being directed to this thread by Jean (for which I say thankee-sai) and reading the responses and contrasting opinions, I feel I should share my own. I am on my first read-through of the series and have just finished the part in SoS where Roland and Eddie meet Stephen King, I had already known King played some role in the series before I reached this part, and I had been looking forward to it as the concept of it really sounded interesting. My first opinion however was similar to others who believe it just should not have been done, it pulls away from the story and seems very narcissistic at points (as mentioned already the idea of Roland and King being so similar they might be brothers, as well as the general idea of King being this godlike figure which Roland falls onto one knee for). However I've taken on a lot of what has been said, especially the ideas conveyed by Jean, the fact of the matter is that the Dark Tower concerns all universes, so why should it not include our own? And if our universe is to be included you could not ignore the importance of a man who writes about Roland and the Dark Tower, it's almost as if it really connects us as the reader to the series, or at least tries to, by showing that indeed our own world hangs in the balance as much as any other.
I conclude in my head and heart that the concept behind King's role is both required and certainly interesting, its execution was perhaps poorly handled in some areas but I'm sure by the time I finish the series it will all fall into place and I might reconcile with my own opinions on a second read-through.