I haven't read this one, but I've read a synopsis of it. A point was brought up that I feel is a fairly good point.
It would be appropriate for King to write a follow-up to the non-fiction book. Being that it's been close to 30 years since the first one, which covered a 30 year period, I would love to read that. (I would also love to read the first one, though.) I agree with the article. It would definitely be appropriate.
Thoughts?
Has this thread been made before?