Henry II (The Lion in Winter)
Dracula (Dracula - 1931)
Henry II (The Lion in Winter)
Dracula (Dracula - 1931)
BMCOAT - TIE BREAKER! Round 1, Group I
Henry II (The Lion in Winter)
Dracula (Dracula - 1931)
dr acu laaa ha ha ha (oh my word that sounds more like the count from sesame street)
Henry, of course
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have to agree (you knew I would).Originally Posted by Jean
It'll take a lot more than words and guns,
A whole lot more than riches and muscle.
The hands of the many must join as one.
And together we'll cross the river.
Puscifer, "The Humbling River"
Bears wonder who the third nerd could be - there are three votesI have to agree (you knew I would).
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
voted for dracula but I would like to make it known that I consider Christopher Lee to be a far better dracula than bela
if the worlds gonna end then let's get it over with, i got shit to do
Lots of Draculas are better than Bela. I think its more about the character and the impact that character had. Bela was just a vehicle. Because of that I voted Dracula too. As much of a fan I am of Lion in Winter and Peter O'Toole I can't deny the fact that most people have never heard of that movie whereas Dracula is iconic.
Actually, I'm a little ashamed that I didn't offer up Peter O'Toole's TE Lawrence as one of the greatest movie characters.
neither did I! shame on us
better luck next year
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think characters with single films are stronger because there is less of a chance of their becoming a parody of themselves. There are many nominations here that I loved in the first movie, but sequels made me ignore them. I had to consider the character as a whole.
It'll take a lot more than words and guns,
A whole lot more than riches and muscle.
The hands of the many must join as one.
And together we'll cross the river.
Puscifer, "The Humbling River"
With Dracula, I've never even really cared for the novel.
I do think that a case could be made that, since having "a deep impact on cinema as a whole" was one of the criteria which feev originally set forth, a character with a high enough high point may still qualify when taken as a whole, even if it is one that has many low points.
I would consider those many, many low points as part of the impact since an impact can be positive or negative.
<---super duper massively hardcore horror fan
It'll take a lot more than words and guns,
A whole lot more than riches and muscle.
The hands of the many must join as one.
And together we'll cross the river.
Puscifer, "The Humbling River"
Dracula advances!
oops...
Ask not what bears can do for you, but what you can do for bears. (razz)
When one is in agreement with bears one is always correct. (mae)
bears are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
