I don't agree with it. either. I live in rural NC, where the communities, and even the nearest city (Winston-Salem, grown by mainly the success of RJ Reynolds) were established, built, funded, and grown by the tobacco industry. I know to each his own, and I do believe that even despite the health risks, it is still a personal decision for each individual.
But this, to me, seems to be furthering the attempts and campaign to rid the country of tobacco use. Even in this area, where anti-tobacco sentiment did not have a warm welcome, most places are smoke and tobacco-free. Even most factories now are tobacco free. All health insurance carriers here now have a discounted premium if you certify that you are a non-user. I feel that they think that if they tax the shit out of it then it would deter more people from using it. Which, will probably be the case. But those users that are either totally addicted, or those who choose the personal satisfaction of it, will continue to buy it regardless if it cost 50 bucks more a pound. As long as their financial status still allowed them the money for it. Some would regardless and let other things fall to the wayside. I know people who cannot afford their homes, cars, or gas to go places, but still get their carton a week. So a further deterrent plus more income for the govt. I'm sure they see it as a win-win situation.