And that's exactly the problem I have with it. I'll reserve final judgment until I actually see the film. But the trailer makes it look like a straight up action blockbuster flick, which is so unlike Ritchie in my opinion. I'm with Jayson, I never expected to see that type of film from him. Honestly he could re-imagine Sherlock Holmes in any way he wanted and it wouldn't bother me. I'll also add that I'm not a fan of action films at all, and that's the way the trailer portrayed the film to be, so that could also be why I was disappointed in it. But we'll see. He has a unique style to his films so I'm hoping to see that in this one as well.
Only the gentle are ever really strong.
Went and saw Angels and Demons... It was okay. Not great. No where as good as the book.
The Man In Black Fled Across The Desert...
...And The Gunslinger Followed.
“I’m always on the Batman rule, sir.” - Kate Kane / Detective Comics 857
"It is the story, not he who tells it." Except to us collectors who have to put limits somewhere. - jhanic
Remember, Remember, The Fifth of November, The Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot.
I saw it last week, too, Pam. I agree, the book was a LOT better, but I love Tom Hanks and it was fun to see familiar places I've visited before. The worst part of the whole movie was when my cruel, cruel friend decided to scare the bejesus out of me and slap my leg while there was an exciting scene going on. I almost screamed. And I almost slapped him. raagh.
"...neither the stupid jokes nor the easy surface emotions were the truth of Cuthbert Allgood."
I saw it today. It was good. But I think you're right. Book is better.*as usual*
Angels&Demons
The Da Vinci Code was one of the most boring and unnecessary movies I've ever seen. How was it compared to that guys? All the commercials have been saying "all critics agree that Angels and Demons surpasses the Da Vinci Code in every way" which is tantamount to "modern medicine is more advanced than Hippocrates in all respects."
Well, Ryan, imho A&D was indeed better than Da Vinci Code (which made me yaaaaawn). At least A&D kept me wide awake for the whole time.
"...neither the stupid jokes nor the easy surface emotions were the truth of Cuthbert Allgood."
Bahaha.
The DaVinci Code was terribly boring for me, but that's because I had read and liked the book. It was one of those "directly translated to film" movies, so I knew everything that was going on, there were no surprises, and Tom Hanks was IN NO WAY the character in my mind. I didn't like it at all.
I enjoyed reading Angels and Demons much better than DaVinci Code. But I will not be seeing the film. I just can't get over Tom as Robert Langdon. Bah.
"...neither the stupid jokes nor the easy surface emotions were the truth of Cuthbert Allgood."
My problem... I found A&D long... long... and there were some very SLOW parts. I would put it on the exact same level as DaVinci, movie-wise. Except Tom Hanks had a better hair cut.
Actually, I really enjoyed Ian McKellen in DaVinci and felt that was really good casting... so that might make DaVinci slightly better for me... Then again, the woman who played Sophie was so badly cast... kind of a toss up.
I wouldn't rush out to see A&D in the theaters.
The Man In Black Fled Across The Desert...
...And The Gunslinger Followed.
“I’m always on the Batman rule, sir.” - Kate Kane / Detective Comics 857
"It is the story, not he who tells it." Except to us collectors who have to put limits somewhere. - jhanic
Remember, Remember, The Fifth of November, The Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot.
[quote=AlishaRiley;392573] well, i watched Mirrors last night. i'd say the 1st half was more atmospheric and scared me more. the 2nd half was ok, but tested my patience a few times
i love scarey movies and i must say this one made me jump in a few places, one was unintentional much to the amusement of mr c who fairly fell off the sofa laughin at me
Watched Angels & Demons yesterday, and like everyone has already said, it's way better than The Da Vinci Code. By far. Which is not to say that I think it's an amazing movie, but hey, it entertains. It's obviously not nearly as good as the book since they have to cram it into a two-hour movie (It's impressive how all the characters can talk their heads off explaining things so the audience is kept relatively informed while running all over Vatican City.), but it's a fun film to go watch and kill some time.
I just got finished watching Mulholland Drive.
Hmmm.
It seems to me like one of those movies that doesn't actually make any sense, but people don't want to admit they don't get it, so they all say it's brilliant, and then it gets amazing reviews for being brilliant, so more people watch it and say it's brilliant, furthering the widely accepted notion that it's brilliant.
And that is all I have to say about that. *shrugs*
Anyone else seen this film?
Yes, I love it. I've watched it dozens of times.
It's David Lynch...so, what do you expect?
David Lynch made the movie and has suggested that he doesn't get it. I suspect he wasn't entirely serious about that, but this is a movie where you could drop a sheet of good blotter and still not fully understand what was going on. Everything means something and nothing means anything. It's still amazing.
Alright.
Well, it's good to know that I'm not supposed to get it... I guess?
That's kind of irritating though - what makes it so amazing if it doesn't make any sense?
I mean, one could venture a guess, but without confirmation...? I dunno.
If you don't walk out of a David Lynch film saying "Wha?".... or "Who the hell was the cowboy-guy?" then you really didn't enjoy yourself properly.
The Man In Black Fled Across The Desert...
...And The Gunslinger Followed.
“I’m always on the Batman rule, sir.” - Kate Kane / Detective Comics 857
"It is the story, not he who tells it." Except to us collectors who have to put limits somewhere. - jhanic
Remember, Remember, The Fifth of November, The Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot.
Well, it (and his other films) are understandable on some level. It's just your interpretation might not be exactly the same as everyone else's and Lynch isn't precisely forthcoming about it. There are visual cues/clues as to what's going on. With each watching you gain more from it and eventually get to a closer understanding of events. I think it's set up though to where a total understanding is nearly impossible though; especially with Lynch himself unwilling to really explain.
Yeah, that about sums it up.