My laptop died on Monday night and I have only just now managed to get myself up and running on a replacement.
I want to apologise in advance for resurfacing this "conversation", but I have been wanting to post on this particular topic since Monday. I think when members read the significance of what I am about to post, they will understand why this was necessary....
So please excuse me, whilst I blow this shit wide open!!!
Originally Posted by
Br!an
All anyone has to do is look at what you sell and form their own opinion.
It seems like most members here, including a respectable number of veteran members, have formed the opinion that what you offer is less than desirable.
We've already danced this dance and you know that I think you sell shit mixed in with an occasional legit.
BTW it's only libel if you can prove the signatures are good. If you could do that we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Originally Posted by
redsoxfan565
Brian, I have photos of every single King signature I've ever obtained and I can post them for you to prove to me which ones you believe are forged. So far you have not done that and haven't even posted which ones you question the authenticity of.
Originally Posted by
redsoxfan565
Your posts consist of wild accusations with no basis, and no credibility, as has Johns.
Originally Posted by
redsoxfan565
I have nothing to hide regarding any of the signatures in my store, even King which is why there is a closeup photo of every single King book in my store.
If that is the case, redsoxfan; can you explain why you are using identical photos of the signatures in your eBay listings?
On the 24th May 2015 you sold a "signed" copy of Skeleton Crew with the following photo of the signature page:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/STEPHEN-KING-SIGNED-SKELETON-CREW-1ST-EDITION-1ST-PRINTING-HARDCOVER-BOOK-/151663510729?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item234fd9 84c9
Then you sold another "signed" copy of Skeleton Crew on 23rd June 2015 with this photo of the signature...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/STEPHEN-KING-SIGNED-SKELETON-CREW-1ST-EDITION-1ST-PRINTING-HARDCOVER-BOOK-/161720940535?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item25a751 b7f7
It's not as if this is a one off either. You sold a Stephen King and Peter Straub dual "signed" copy of The Talisman on 10th June 2015 with this photo...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/STEPHEN-KING-PETER-STRAUB-DUAL-SIGNED-AUTOGRAPH-THE-TALISMAN-BOOK-/161705508567?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item25a666 3ed7
You now have another copy of the same book and signatures listed within eBay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/STEPHEN-KING-PETER-STRAUB-DUAL-SIGNED-AUTOGRAPH-THE-TALISMAN-BOOK-/151716740481?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item235305 bd81
If it was a one off, you could say it was a mistake. But to do it twice in listings a month apart? You're having a fucking laugh, pal!
Why would you want to advertise the same identical signatures in your listings anyway, unless you have something to hide? It's obvious that Stephen King has not managed to identically sign two different books, as that would be absolutely impossible to do.
Instead what we have here, is the fact that unless you are using an auto-pen to duplicate Stephen King's signature, at least two (if not all) of the books from those listed above will have different signatures to what is actually being listed on your eBay store. This in itself is a breach of eBay's trading policy and terms of service, as the books by definition will be "not as described".
Notwithstanding the fact that this is most definitely foul play, it also illustrates the very real notion that you could be listing what is on the surface a legit signature, but in reality sending out badly forged signatures with your books that are too shit to publically advertise within your eBay store.
How do we know that all the other books in your listings do not contain duplicate and identical signatures?
Very, very shady indeed...
Or am I just making wild accusations without credibility too, eh? LOL!