HELP ME FIND
Insomnia #459
ANY S/L #459
28 in 23 (?)!!!!
63 in '23!!!!!!!!!!
My Collection: https://www.thedarktower.org/palaver...ion-Merlin1958
The Houston Astros cheated Major League Baseball from 2017-18!!!! Is that how we teach our kids to play the game now?????
Nice, Kris!
You don't know my kind.....You don't my mind.....Dark necessities are part of my design.....
Old school IT is showing on the SciFy channel right now.
You don't know my kind.....You don't my mind.....Dark necessities are part of my design.....
Awesome, Kris! Congrats! I've called in and won a few radio contests, but they've never called me!
A NEW GAME BEGINS
I went to the IT themed art show at Gallery 1988 in Los Angeles today. Here's some pics.
Spoiler:
Also, I picked up a few of these promo items. I've lost touch with what is all out there, but these seem to be special vr glasses for use at itthemovie.com/vr. PM me if anyone wants one.
I think the promo item is intended to be folded and have a phone clipped in, then when held to the face, the phone keeps the correct constant distance from the eyes (and reduces ambient light) so that as a person rotates their head, or revolves in a chair, the video VR video experience is maximized.
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/sequel-...141941888.html
(Please stop writing It as an acronym!)Andy Muschietti, the director of the new adaptation of Stephen King’s ‘IT’ (in cinemas 8 September), has given Yahoo Movies an exclusive update on the film’s sequel, the as-yet-untitled ‘IT: Chapter Two’.
Speaking to Yahoo from Los Angeles, Muschietti told us the present-day sequel would explore the “transdimensional” element of King’s source novel that the first film deftly side-steps. He also explained why they couldn’t make the novel’s trippy finale work this time around.
“I really wanted to focus on the emotional journey of the group of kids,” ‘Mama’ director Muschietti told Yahoo Movies.
“Getting in to that other dimension – the other side – was something that we could introduce in the second part. In the book the perspective of the writing… is always with the Losers, so everything they know about Pennywise is very speculative and shrouded in absurdity, so I wanted to respect that mystery feeling of not knowing what’s on the other side.”
For the uninitiated, the original 1986 novel (and the 1990 TV miniseries) sees Bill Denborough (Jaeden Lieberher) and the Losers Club first confronting Pennywise as kids through the “Ritual of Chüd”. The gang enter another dimension and Pennywise is revealed to be a huge otherworldly spider-creature located in a strange realm known as the “deadlights”.
Carey Fukunaga’s original script (the ‘True Detective’ S1 director was originally attached) is said to have been a more direct adaptation of the source material with a similar final act featuring a VFX-heavy “inter-dimensional portal”.
Muschietti’s ‘IT’ has a much more grounded final confrontation with Pennywise that only hints at the otherworldliness of the shapeshifting antagonist. The 1990 TV mini-series tried – and fell short – of honouring Stephen King’s vision on its limited budget, so it sounds like Muschietti wants to ensure the financial success of the first film before throwing money at a VFX-heavy stand off in the second film.
“I also wanted to leave something for the second half, so I didn’t want to get in trouble with that – going into the macroverse or that transdimensional stuff – and keep it grounded, from the point of view of the kids,” he adds.
“There’s another movie to expand into that. Also, there’s a physical truth that it’s a movie that has a budget. And I didn’t want to get into a depiction of a realm that f***s up our budget, the creation of a world that will basically suck up half of our budget, and would have to sacrifice a lot of things.
“So basically it’s a balancing act, but it’s also intricately connected with the content, which is staying true to the emotional aspect of the book.”
Muschietti also reaffirmed his intention for the sequel to return to the timeline of the first film alongside its present day-set storyline, which suggests the impressive young cast (including ‘Stranger Things’ star Finn Wolfhard) will return for ‘Chapter Two’.
“There will be a dialogue between the two timelines,” he explained, “which is something that I love from the book. So it’s not just the [Losers’ Club as] adults, we’re going to come back to 1989.”
Throwing this one out there for the adult casting:
Casting the adults is going to be crucial; I don't want to get a Final Destination vibe when watching It pt 2 (FD was fine for what it was, but I think It demands a weightier approach with quality talent).
Eastasia has always provided Drag Queen Story Hour to young children.
I think Pennywise is making an appearance at the affordable art fair.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wanted:
Michael Whelan & DT Original Art
Where is it printed as such? Have you read the novel recently?
I asked the "experts" here this very question a while ago; the consensus seemed to be "It" is correct, not "IT," although it seems we still don't have universal agreement on this.
(Helpful hint: Stephen King's name is not STEPHEN KING, although it often appears that way.)
Eastasia has always provided Drag Queen Story Hour to young children.
In doing research (10 second search just now that is) I found this, pretty cool.....
Anyone here have all the covers??
The catalog does have it listed as IT and nearly all the covers as well but this is a stylization and I learned during the music tournament that Pablo () is not a fan of stylizations when it comes to proper spellings.
For example, Nine Inch Nails will sometimes stylize their name as nine inch nails and Tool will spell theirs as TOOL. Kesha used to spell her name as Ke$ha but she has dropped that. We all have our pet peeves. Personally, either spelling doesn't bother me because I always know what they are referring to.
It is now common to refer to "It" as "IT".
The copyright page for the US trade first edition shows the title as "It". I'm in the process of rereading the book (100 pages left).
It is constantly referred to as It. Capitol I, lower case t.
BTAIM, the spellings are now interchangeable. Not my decision, but reality.
The Catalog spelling is technically incorrect, and I am considering changing it.
<---------------Amazed how often "it" comes up in writing.