Announcements

**turtlex** · 10-13-2010 09:25 AM

Originally Posted by feverishparade

I vote No on the sig image increase !

I hate going to a website with no sig image limit and having to scroll through fucking comic book page -sized images

I'm going to agree with Feev here.

Actually, I've had people PM me and ask if there's a size limit or not because someone has a sig ( not even the pic, but just a super long sig ) that's so large, each post takes a whole page.

**pathoftheturtle** · 10-13-2010 10:14 AM

I'm so jealous.

You guys look great.

**fernandito** · 10-13-2010 10:30 AM

You still having trouble, Path ? What's the original size of your image ? Try saving the image under a different name and reuploading it.

**pathoftheturtle** · 10-13-2010 10:40 AM

I've got that one I've tried & tried that's 190x140 pixels, and now I'm trying a completely different image, originally sized 180x145. Whatever, it's auto-reduced continually.

**Randall Flagg** · 10-13-2010 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by pathoftheturtle

I'm so jealous.

You guys look great.

Try it now. I took the liberty of changing your pic, please change it back.

**pathoftheturtle** · 10-13-2010 11:05 AM

Yes. Thanks.

But now I've got no option to "Edit Signature" on my Control Panel.

**Randall Flagg** · 10-13-2010 11:11 AM

Please try now.

**pathoftheturtle** · 10-13-2010 11:14 AM

Yeah! All systems "GO"!
Many thanks.

**Randall Flagg** · 10-13-2010 11:34 AM

Thanks for bearing with me.
On my browser your turtle shows at the far lower right of your signature.

**Jean** · 10-13-2010 11:36 AM

so it does on mine (Opera)

**pathoftheturtle** · 10-13-2010 11:37 AM

Yeah, I just did that... trying to get it to center right. Hrm... Well, I'll figure that out.
Thanks again.

**gsvec** · 10-13-2010 03:05 PM

Originally Posted by Telynn

Originally Posted by jhanic

Bad for me. I don't have a wide-screen monitor.

John

I have the same issue.

I was having the same issue, too, but it seems to be fixed now!

Thanks, RF!

**LadyHitchhiker** · 10-13-2010 03:15 PM

I think the bigger avatars look quite impressive.

I like them a lot.

**Telynn** · 10-13-2010 05:12 PM

Originally Posted by gsvec

Originally Posted by Telynn

Originally Posted by jhanic

Bad for me. I don't have a wide-screen monitor.

John

I have the same issue.

I was having the same issue, too, but it seems to be fixed now!

Thanks, RF!

Fixed for me too! Thanks!

**Telynn** · 10-13-2010 05:22 PM

Originally Posted by She-Ra

Originally Posted by Telynn

Originally Posted by jhanic

Bad for me. I don't have a wide-screen monitor.

John

I have the same issue.

I would LOVE for George to be bigger

Me too!!! How do I make the angel of our dreams bigger size???? What's the best method?

**Telynn** · 10-13-2010 05:35 PM

Nevermind. I got it. *Sigh* George is happy with the change too.

**John Blaze** · 10-13-2010 05:41 PM

my eyes....MY EYES!!!!!!!!

**Telynn** · 10-13-2010 05:48 PM

Are you suggesting that I should make George smaller?

**Mattrick** · 10-13-2010 05:50 PM

Originally Posted by feverishparade

I vote No on the sig image increase !

I hate going to a website with no sig image limit and having to scroll through fucking comic book page -sized images

I'm fine with Width increase, but not much more on height. 200-250 I think is suffice. Wider wouldn't make much difference.

**Daghain** · 10-14-2010 05:50 AM

Originally Posted by Barry Eagan

Originally Posted by feverishparade

I vote No on the sig image increase !

I hate going to a website with no sig image limit and having to scroll through fucking comic book page -sized images

I'm fine with Width increase, but not much more on height. 200-250 I think is suffice. Wider wouldn't make much difference.

I could get behind that.

**Tito_Villa** · 10-14-2010 06:06 AM

I like the increase but also agree that there has to be a limit around 200 for it to work!

**John Blaze** · 10-14-2010 07:51 AM

Originally Posted by Daghain

Originally Posted by Barry Eagan

Originally Posted by feverishparade

I vote No on the sig image increase !

I hate going to a website with no sig image limit and having to scroll through fucking comic book page -sized images

I'm fine with Width increase, but not much more on height. 200-250 I think is suffice. Wider wouldn't make much difference.

I could get behind that.

I did say 200x700, idk where all this about unlimited sig space is coming from. We already use 200x500, what's 200 more on the banner? The space is being wasted anyway. Anyone have any comments on my words about web-hosting?

**Daghain** · 10-14-2010 07:52 AM

What about web hosting? I must have missed it

**John Blaze** · 10-14-2010 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by He-Man

You know, I read in the site moving plea thread that we're testing new avs to see if maybe we will keep them, as long as they don't slow down load page times. TBH, although bigger avs WOULD be nice, I'd rather have bigger sig banners, like a 700x200. IDK, that's just me. Maybe you could do a poll about that. Also, the avatars get hosted here, whereas banners have to be hosted elsewhere, so wouldn't the bigger avs slow down page load times more than banners that are hosted at photo hosting sites, or such? Again, not a computer expert. Just my 2 cents.

bump for new page

**Daghain** · 10-14-2010 07:56 AM

I think where the pic is hosted is probably irrelevant, unless the hosting site is down for some reason. Most people use Photobucket if it's not on here, and usually that loads just fine.

Thread: Announcements

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions