Re-Read King Books--ALL of them--Who's with me?

[beam*seeker]

I am embarking on the ambitious but (for me at least) intensely pleasurable journey of re-reading all of King's (fictional) books (and short stories, novellas, etc.)

Wondering if there is an interest in a Re-Reading club? (If this has been done in another thread, cry your pardon, but I could not find it and I DID look).

I was thinking of going in order of publication (chiefly because that is how my list is organized) but wondering if any of you CR have suggestions for alternative reading order lists?

Toyed with the idea of the suggested order of books in the DT thread with the incorporated bits from Hearts in Atlantis, Insomnia, Little Sisters of Euluria, and Eyes of the Dragon, but in the end I think I will go chronologically with the novels, then if I have the stamina, tackle the nonfiction, then the published journal articles.

Comments? Suggestions? Dares? Heckling?

Anyone else for a re-read of all the books? Clearly if you are a bookgeek like me you should have the time to devote.

[Jean]

sounds very, very, VERY tempting

bears wish they could say right away that they would participate... and maybe yes, they will

it's beautiful experience, knowing that you're reading a book at the same time as your friends do (that's one of the reasons why we have that bookclub)

knowing that you're reading the same ton of them must be even awesomer

[ICry4Oy]

My first thought was ****runs to bedroom, grabs gun, shoots self in hea......***

[beam*seeker]

LOL

[LadyHitchhiker]

My first thought was that I haven't read all of them yet (missed a few) to re-read them.... so I would have to selectively be part of the group... bummer...

My second thought was, "I didn't finish Lisey's Story and I don't know if I can!"

[beam*seeker]

It's no pressure. Just thought it'd be fun to try and discuss as we go. Is Lisey's Story really that bad?

[frik]

Is Lisey's Story really that bad?

Certainly not!
The best Kingbook of the last two decades-easily.
It's King's own favorite, I believe, and close to mine.

sk

[Jean]

the post above tells me I overlooked something... but my memory tells me I didn't

thus, maybe, a global re-read is really a good idea, I will have to re-read LS, for the sake of intellectual honesty

[Ricky]

Lisey's Story isn't terrible, it's just a bit of a departure from SK's regular writing and plot. I think that the people (and least people I've seen) who were disappointed in Lisey's Story have only their own expectations to blame.

[frik]

maybe, a global re-read is really a good idea

Nah - that way it'll take you -and anyone else- years to finally (re)read this book - at least, if the books are read in order of publication.
Just go ahead and read it - You might even like it.

sk

[The Road Virus]

My first thought was also I haven't read nearly all of them so I can't re-read but I have thought about starting to do chron. order after 2 or 3 more books I want to read. So I would like to participate for the ones I haven't read yet.

My second thought was I'm not gonna re-read Insomnia, can't do it. Ha

[Jean]

maybe, a global re-read is really a good idea

Nah - that way it'll take you -and anyone else- years to finally (re)read this book - at least, if the books are read in order of publication.
Just go ahead and read it - You might even like it.

sk

No, hardly years - I can average one King novel a week if I don't read more than two books parallel to it. I need some very serious stimulation to open LS again. Your opinion, though, is a step in that direction... maybe in summer -

[WeDealInLead]

I might be up for it next year. I'm not planning on doing much reading during summer. I mean, it's summer time, time to hit the beach and hang out outdoors.

I'm reading everything chronologically for the most part. The only times I cheat are when I finish some sort of mammoth book (It, Needful Things etc), I'll read something shorter to keep the momentum going (The Girl Who..., The Colorado Kid, Blaze etc). I have less than 10 left and if I'm to judge a book by the reviews and opinions from 'the worst book' thread, there are a few I'm really dreading.

[Jimimck]

I'd be keen, but doubt I could commit to a time frame to have them finished in, which I assume you'd need to agree on up front to keep things rolling for the masses. You're right though, it is fun reading a book with someone else, especially when you start the "did you get to this part yet" and :" oh and what about..."

[Jean]

yes, exactly!

and, WeDealInLead - thank you for reminding me of Bachman books... I am afraid I might have to skip Blaze and Roadwork. These two devastated me. I am not sure I am up to this, emotionally. Few books impressed me so deep, and left a bear in such total emotional ruins

or do we have to include Bachman at all?

[beam*seeker]

Well, I just got a gift card burning a hole in my pocket and so I guess I will start with Carrie. To be fair, I am not sure if there are some I would skip on the reread as well. Not sure I am ready to read the DT series again so soon. I may save it for a grand finale.

[The Road Virus]

Depending how long it takes you with Carrie vs. how long it takes me to finish the rest of The Stand, I would be down to start going chron. with you starting @ Salem's Lot at least for a few books

[LadyHitchhiker]

I love Stephen King's writing.. I understand he goes through changes with books, but after 100 pages into Lisey's Story, and not knowing where the woman is crazy, if she's dead or if her husband's really dead, and just too MUCH mystery, I got overwhelmed and put it aside. That was when it first came out to paperback. Anyone got a date on that? Too lazy to look it up right now. I've NEVER given up on a Stephen King book. So far, though, I'm just excited by the wonderful updates of our local library, and how it has magnificent actually really new stuff that I actually want to read, so I've been getting caught up with that "new book" excitement, that can be so intoxicating.

Oh and for the record, I didn't care for Blaze, but I finished it. But he warns us in the beginning that it's not his favorite work, either. I would re-read it though, with friends, and maybe through that fashion discover a joy in the book that I did not find originally.

Hell, I'll even do Lisey's story if it's with friends.. I'll try! I'll force myself... it'll be homework!

And another thing for the record: I know Insomnia was hard to get through, it starts completely slow... but I truly ended up loving that book!

[Jean]

And another thing for the record: I know Insomnia was hard to get through, it starts completely slow... but I truly ended up loving that book!

just the opposite with bears, as usual... I loved the beginning, liked the middle, and got rather bored closer to the end where all the fuss started.

[LadyHitchhiker]

And another thing for the record: I know Insomnia was hard to get through, it starts completely slow... but I truly ended up loving that book!

just the opposite with bears, as usual... I loved the beginning, liked the middle, and got rather bored closer to the end where all the fuss started.

Interesting.... We will have to re-read it in order to bounce opinions off one another, won't we?

[Jean]

everything points at this...

[costanza]

I'm doing a chronological listening of the man's work. Just finished The Langoliers.
I like Willem Defoe as an actor but his read was pretty bad. Oh well, on to Secret Window!

[pixiedark76]

I started reading "Carrie" back in January and now I am reading "The Green Mile" When I read "The Bachman Books" I read the book that had all of them together (except for Blaze) I thought it was easier this way. The Bachman Books were so different than his other works.

[WeDealInLead]

I started chronologically sometime last year and I have 10 or so left. I'm not looking forward to most of them to be honest. I've read some of the later works (last 10 years) and they simply can't compare to the magic of his earlier works. I love most things he wrote up until The Dark Half. Books after that are hit or miss for me. I don't know, King is to writters what Metallica is to heavy metal. Very low quality control, very big egos, and some bizzare notion that every riff (or story) needs to be recorded/written down and made public. Not every idea is a good idea and I think King (and Metallica) are soooo big that no one has the guts to tell them that maybe what they're working on isn't so good. Sure, one could find redeeming quality in most things they do (guitar tone or a chapter, passage etc) but we also didn't have to LOOK FOR THEM in the earlier works. They were simply there. Dreamcatcher vs. The Shining (or any early work really), St. Anger vs. Master of Puppets. Know what I mean?

Anyways... I'm still interested in doing this but maybe a more fitting re-read would be the complete DT re-read? I think with the new book coming out next spring and Little Sisters, I'd be more interested in that than all 50 or so books.

[pixiedark76]

I agree with you on the DT re-read. It would be fun to dive back into the DT universe again.