Search:

At least he doesn't state it was signed by the author. LOL

The Shining may or may not be good, but the Christine is flat out laughable.

That took me to a search result Caretaker.

Edit: the post I was referring to is now gone...

EOTD looks horrible to me. Misery is good, comparing them makes the EOTD look worse, even if it is real I wouldn't want it.

I think the Regulators looks good.
But, as this seller does sell fakes I would stay away myself.

I agree the sig looks perfect for the new SK, but that is strange with the color difference

That UTD is just too odd to even consider buying.

That 11/22/63 Looks fine to me, he did so many cramped and fast sigs in those books.

I may have to disagree or at least question that Four Past Midnight. the close up looks very fluid to me, and we all know his newer sigs are looking really bad, if this was just a drive by "please...

For me, which I am no expert, that looks horrible, so many things wrong there it's hard to know where to start. But again, I am no expert.

I informed the seller of this book, it is a BCE and s/he changed the listing to include that info, although it still starts at $19 *rolleyes*

Are you suggesting that sig is not good? It looks spot on to me, is that the sticker the bookstore in Florida uses when he pops in and sigs a few books on the shelves?

Fake

I think it is authentic, but so ulgy it hurts the eyes.

Obviously a BCE, are they considered 1st editions since it's the same book on the inside, or is the fact the DJ is different and it has different boards enough to make it a different edition?

I think $25 for shipping is outrageous.[/QUOTE]

LOL

I agree with that.

Well I love Sgc1999 and I did try to keep my mouth shut for as long as I could but the temptation was too great after seeing the above images.
I do think this one is a forgery (Im sorry SGC1999!)....

I asked for more pics and he added them to the listing along with sending to me. After seeing them I am still on the side of good, jmo.

I am falling on the side of good. I do see your point about the underline, it seems too straight, doesn't he "usually" have a bit of a curve in those?