I think we'll both argue this point to death without either side changing their minds. As we've seen with the nominations in this tournament, the horror genre is wide and encompasses many different...
Type: Posts; User: Merlin1958
I think we'll both argue this point to death without either side changing their minds. As we've seen with the nominations in this tournament, the horror genre is wide and encompasses many different...
Well yeah, I'm not going to end every statement with 'in my opinion', I mean I assume that's implied.
Dreamcather is sci-fi.[/QUOTE]
Well there you go then. Dreamcatchers' plot premise is...
That doesn't necessarily make them right. Look, they label, Stephen King a "Horror writer", nut he has written other novels that are not really "Horror". Just because a few knuckleheads with a degree...
That doesn't necessarily make them right. Look, they label, Stephen King a "Horror writer", nut he has written other novels that are not really "Horror". Just because a few knuckleheads with a degree...
That doesn't necessarily make them right. Look, they label, Stephen King a "Horror writer", nut he has written other novels that are not really "Horror". Just because a few knuckleheads with a degree...
This is a miscarriage of justice. "Alien" is a "Sci-Fi/Horror" flick and "The Exorcist " is a true to life, traditional horror movie. If "Alien" wins, I call "foul"!!!!!
Then again, I suppose...