Search:

That's an interesting take. So interesting I don't feel I can respond justly to it-- so I'll leave it to others (for the time being).

^ I was going to say something similar Heather. I think fans of King will say most/all of his stuff is well-written Bears. Doesn't mean they liked it though.

Ah. Then proceed.

:orely:[/QUOTE]

**Of the 32 King novels I have read thus far**

Better my anal buddy (yes, I get how this sounds :lol:)?

I read HinA, and loved it. I would agree that it starts off a lot stronger than it finishes, but not even close to his worst work.

It's Insomnia. Period.

No wayyy. At least with BB you could tell you were reading a King story, even if you didn't buy into the premise. TGWLTG is a yarn with no bite. The horror-vision she sees in the woods struck me as...

Yes! Thank you. First person I've heard put it at the bottom of the barrel.

Tommyknockers I went in knowing it was in the vein of 40s Sci-fi AND that it was at the peak of King's drug abuse. Therefore, I thought the over-the-top occurrences blended with real observations...

It's in my bookcase but there's so many other King books that call to me more based on their premise. I will read it eventually, but probably not till summer at the earliest.

Icic. I've never read it, so I was just curious.

Not to be overly anal, but isn't HiA a short story collection?

Jean, to expound on what I said in a suggested appropriate place, I think Insomnia and TGWLTM are his two worst I've come across thus far. Both for the same fundamental reason; they're so slow and...