Search:

Because it makes you want to gag?



:lol:[/QUOTE]


That too! Hey, if I was on the receiving end of that gift, I'd put it in my collection. :lol:

If it's not too expensive, that would be an amazing gag gift. :rofl:

I agree. Alot of the sigs. from the signing I went to looked very similiar to the one above.

If it's a fake, it's an incredibly good fake.

Definitely fake.

1. The "g" is a "loop", regular cursive "g", rather than his normal one.
2. SK doesn't sign photos.

That's a tough one. I'd say fake though due to the "g" being too swoopy and "complete". The underline is too long and signature too slanted.

Wow. Even it it were signed twice, I wouldn't pay $1,000. For something that's just a regular book, what makes him believe it's worth that much? :|

The STEPHEN looks terribly fake. The KING looks fine. However, the date doesn't look right. In King's old and newer signatures, he kind of does his dates on a slight slant. This one looks too...

That's just embarassing. :wtf:

I predict that you're dead-on. For every idiotic seller, there's an idiotic buyer.

I swear, some of those eBay dealers must think we're half retarded or something.

That's a rather old contest...I entered it. On the autograph site that I belong to (www.movieeye.com) they ran the contest joined with Live Autographs. Needless to say, I didn't win. :)

It's definitely a fake--that "S" is terrible. Also, SK writes his signature on more of a slant.

Send the sparrows on 'em! :shoot: