Today I was thinking generally about King's role in Song of Susannah.
Did you like his appearance in the novel?
Do you think King created Roland by writing about him or did Roland already exist and King just wrote about him?
Printable View
Today I was thinking generally about King's role in Song of Susannah.
Did you like his appearance in the novel?
Do you think King created Roland by writing about him or did Roland already exist and King just wrote about him?
Erin?? What is this "Awesome topic night"? :cool:
Personally, like King says in the book he's not Gan, but sings Gan's song. So in the process of writing about Roland and his quest he gives force to it. But is definitely not a puppeteer, nor do I think of Gan as a puppeteer. There is always a chance that things go differently because of the Red King's will.
:lol: I don't know what came over me tonight.
I like it a lot.
Yeah, this is cool - I was online until midnight last night, so I wasn't expecting to have much to do when I came to the board this morning :thumbsup:
When I first read the books and got to King's role in them, it really jarred me at first. See, when I'm reading - it doesn't matter where I am, alone or with people, somewhere quiet, somewhere noisy - if I get into the story I'm simply not there at all while I'm reading. I totally get transported by a good book.
But when SK first put himself in the tale it was as if I'd been thrown back into my chair and reality with a bump. There was too much realism in it, but not in a good way. Then, I kinda started to enjoy it because it started to make sense - plus the writing was still good, and King furthered the plot and gave it a new twist as a character, instead of being self ingratiating.
Now, whenever I'm rereading, I can't imagine the book without King being in it.
I thought it was very cool of himself to included him self, expessily with all his faults
Expessily?
Exacly what I was thinking. After rereading, I liked it a lot better, and it made sense in the end. But the first time I didn't like it. At all. :DQuote:
When I first read the books and got to King's role in them, it really jarred me at first. See, when I'm reading - it doesn't matter where I am, alone or with people, somewhere quiet, somewhere noisy - if I get into the story I'm simply not there at all while I'm reading. I totally get transported by a good book.
Thank you for expessing that Daghain.
:D
I'm in Daggers boat. At first I was a little put off by it but I believe King understands his fans are deep thinkers and will eventually figure that kind of thing out.
Seems all together necessary for sure now, when its re thought
I was pretty excited to see King portrayed in the book. I had NO idea where it was going, but his first encounter with Roland was hilarious! And, as it progressed, it DID work.
I know it took the series in a new direction, and for some, it killed their adventure. For me, it deepened it.
Good idea.
I didn't like it. For me, it was one of the things that bogged down the last few books. I didn't think it was done badly. I just think it shouldn't have been done.
King really should have asked me before pulling that shit. :)
He asked me and I said "hell yeah, go ahead. Especially to piss off this guy Cozener"
I knew you were in on it you fuckwad!
Lol...King did manage to pull it off but I just didn't like the whole Deus Ex Machina concept here. Doesn't mean I'm not a deep thinker...am so!!!!!
Right, It basiclly stated that King could only do so much, like CK said, only a minor role
Well I wouldn't say minor, I would more say that he is not actually creating these folk and events but "the pipe, not the water that flow through it" and to go a little farther, not the source of the water.
right, thats a better explaination, well said
Reminds me of the great Carlos Santana quote that the music is the water and the audience is the plant, he is just the hose. I agree, I don't think King necessarily "created" anybody. He's a functionary of ka to help get people in the right place. What they do when they get there is freewill.