I don't think (at least I hope) anyone has a problem with you doing so; it has every reason to appear on TDT.
Printable View
I actually believe he's a pretty solid person and therefore probably hasn't been intentionally untruthful.
Wrong, mistaken, biased, and blind (particularly with regard to anything political)? Yes to all. Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, and he's a sufferer.
"Exoneration" ain't a bad term to use when the case against you falls apart to the point that the investigating prosecutor declines to recommend charges (the only thing Mueller actually had the power to do - and he chose not to).
It's all over but the crying, indeed.
Drive safely, kids.
:emot-roflolmao:
I'm not sure why I occasionally bother to explain this stuff...the people who disagree are the ones who believe in the existence of voluntary concentration camps :shrug:, and I can't really help such people.
In conclusion:
TRUMP 2020
You're being disingenuous, maybe intentionally, I don't know, but Mueller could not indict due to the memo against indicting a sitting president. He specifically said if the President did not commit a crime, they would say so. But they could not say so, because they could not say he did commit a crime. There's no third option.
Most legal experts I’ve seen comment agree if not for the memo the President would’ve been indicted.
I’m not sure that makes any sense. So the guy hired to investigate Trump, and bring charges if necessary finds nothing and states so in his report. Then “legal experts” disagree with a distinguished official and say if not for the report they would have indicted him? What?
I think that people need to come to terms with the fact there was nothing. He said as much and Mueller found as much. It’s completely ridiculous.
He did not state he found nothing. He found plenty and now it is up to Congress to file charges - i.e. impeach. Did you read the report?
He couldn't charge him because of precedent. I notice you didn't answer the question - did you read the report? Obviously not. Get back with us when you do - especially Section II.
(I don't know what TDS is)
Any examples of him being factually wrong?
Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's a catch-all for being bothered by anything Trump does. If you're bothered by Trump admitting he would allow a foreign country to give him dirt on his opponents, as King was, you have TDS.
Oh boy, the same guy who says King is biased (aren't we all?) posts TRUMP 2020 in what is supposed to be an apolitical thread.
It'd be cool if we could keep the politics in the politics thread.
Oh. How cute. Must be taken from the Trump move of calling names if people point out the truth. Although it actually could be appropriate for Trumpers who don't believe the truth even when it hits them in the face.
And yes, as someone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, it bothers me greatly to see our laws flaunted, disrespected and broken.
Sorry. Couldn't stop myself. Maybe the admin can move these posts to the right thread. In the immortal words of the Secretary of Energy - OOPS.
I'm pretty confident that among the "majority of people" who haven't read the report are the likes of De Niro and Laurence Fishburne and most every Hollywood celebrity. My point isn't political as I could care less what these Hollywood types think. It is to point out the hubris of celebrities lecturing people on subjects upon which they have no greater insight than anyone else. This is code for everyone should agree with their views and the only reason the average person does not is because they are ignorant hillbillies who haven't read the report. It's the kind of ersatz elitist nonsense that helped get Trump elected in the first place.
Beautiful. :)
Great video