And it's guarded by that Ninja Killer Blackbird too, darn it!
Printable View
And it's guarded by that Ninja Killer Blackbird too, darn it!
Anybody own MY PRETTY PONY S/L and can look at my lastest purchase. MY PRETTY PONY. I can text you pictures if you PM your cell phone #. When I open the metal cover, it looks like page separation from the Cover and the first page. Not sure what it supposed to look like. I will eventually get my wife to post pictures here, but I wanted to get back to the seller sooner than later.
Thanks for any help!
Does anyone know if Justin Brooks will ever update the 2013 edition of his bibliography?
(I know Justin is a member here but I'm not sure how often he logs in these days)
He updates it for himself, so the question is whether or not it will be publicly released at some point.
I'm sure we will get an updated electronic version soon.
I hope you’re right Alan. I am not adding anything worth mentioning to my collection these days but I use his book to keep tabs on what I have and what I’d like to look for in the future (when I’m done paying tuition fees and buying textbooks).
What do you guys think of the Glenn Chadbourne cover/remarque series from Overlook? Was considering getting one for 'It'.
Maybe not entire an SK question, but does anyone know if Borderlands Press went out of business? Their website is gone (www.borderlandspress.com)
Good little score of a first signed IT and as comfortable as I feel in signatures I wanted my friends here to weigh in... JUST to be sure. Thoughts on signature?
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...5c57a2e0e9.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...cafc6bee05.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Signature looks fine to me; more than fine: love it!
sk
Signature looks good but see if there’s pressure/indentation marks on the paper, suggesting a pen rather than stamp... look at the rear of the page.
I like that signature!
Great signature. I wouldn't turn it away from Room 217.
Mulleins
Look at the Viking logo print, and the Viking ship. They are not grainy, yet the signature is. A free flowing ink pen signature does not look grainy (Except under extreme magnification).
I would need to examine the book in person, but I don't feel comfortable with what I see.
So some of you may have seen these over on FB. I’m posting here to expand my pool of opinions. I have also included a new extreme close up that i didnt put on FB. I have no provenence as this was picked up at an “estate sale”. So far no one has argued that this isnt a sig approriate to the time. I have compared it to my own collection, with two sigs signed in front of me, 6 months before this one and it compares favorably, in my opinion. The sticking point seems to be whether or not it was a Xerox copy (which i agree, it could be) or if it is an autopen using a sig from that time period. And so, i present...
http://www.thedarktower.org/gallery/...E1E4ABF0E.jpeg
http://www.thedarktower.org/gallery/...4746FBCAA.jpeg
http://www.thedarktower.org/gallery/...C0D9849FE.jpeg
Whoa that’s Jack Nicholson’s sig too! If those are real that’s one cool collectible.
A high percentage of signed scripts turn out to be fake. That alone would make me approach with caution. Plus Kings feelings about the movie are well documented, which makes it further suspect. Even if i put all that aside, 'King' looks off to me and i would not want it in my collection.
I said on FB I didn't like it. To elaborate, it looks like the fake ones that are known to be autopen.
Not even close to how a script for that film looked like. Doesn't even have a production company on it and they produce the scripts.
King hated Kubrick's version so bad, he made his own, from his own script, so I don't think he would ever sign a Kubrick one.