*drools*
Printable View
*drools*
Tobey will be back. I would imagine that he wouldn't want to see somebody else playing his role. At least I hope so.
Dunst we'll have to see if they even right her in this one. Spidey has other love interests, right?
I'm not sure who I want to be villian but I'm sure I don't want to see Sand Man.
This was the situation:
Dunst wasn't doing it unless Mcguire and Raimi were back
McGuire wasn't doing it unless Dunst and Raimi were back
Raimi wasn't doing it unless McGuire and Dunst were back.
Last I heard, McGuire and Raimi agreed to do a fourth one. I love Kirtsten but wouldn't miss her in the series.
All the same, Spiderman 3 was worse than X-men 3 and at the moment, could care less if they make a 4th. If it's not the best one made it will be a disappointment.
That's what makes her so attractive.Quote:
You think so? I think she's average, at best.
Is Spiderman 3 worth watching? I've heard such divided opinions on it.
I'll tell you this. Last year, I saw Spiderman 3 on opening day. A few weeks later I wanted to see 28 Weeks Later but my best friend hadn't seen Spiderman 3 yet. He came to see Weeks with me but was upset for a bit we saw that instead of Spiderman 3.
What's the point of this?
A couple weeks ago he watched Spiderman 3, then thanked me for convincing him to see 28 Weeks Later instead. Spiderman 3 is easily the worst of the trilogy.
I would love to see them tackle Mysterio. Or maybe just the whole Sinister Six.
Personally, I would love to see them tackle The Scorpion.
OR... Maybe they should just stop before the Spider-man series turns into the original Batman series. Batman and Robin and Batman Forever were horrible.
Of course, this being said, I would probably still go watch another one.
I'd prefer if they'd cancel any ideas for a Spidey 4 and just include him in the Avengers movie they're doing.
I bet the will (and must) now do a "super hero crossover" type movie at some point.
I wouldn't mind Spidey in with the Avengers.
They are, and both are being released in May and June of this year.
Iron Man will contain NicK Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) with an unknown female (Hillary Swank) accompanying him. They're in the movie to ask Iron Man to join The Avengers.
Then a month later, Nick Fury, the unknown female and Tony Stark will appear in the new Hulk movie.
As it stands "Avengers" will have a cast of Robert Downey Jr. Sam Jackson, Hillary Swank and Edward Norton, plus whoever else is collected as they build towards the Avengers movie.
Jon Favreau has already thrown his hat into the ring to direct The Avengers.
The Thor movie is in pre-production with Matthew Vaughn directing and he's already stated that seeds like the previous ones I mentioned will be planted in Thor for "Avengers" as well.
Interesting... I wonder if any of the characters will get dumped if their individual movies don't do well.
Are they seriously doing a superhero cross over movie? God, shoot me now. Do they think taking a dozen superheros from their own respective, sub par movies and throwing them together will make a good movie? Oh wait, It will make good money so what the fuck does quality matter?
I don't think it could happen, at least , not with the original actors. Too many A-list stars, the movie would have to have a HUGE fucking budget.
Well, they did the Ocean movies. Batman Begins/The Dark Knight are loaded with talent, a couple oscar winners and four or five nominees. Ocean takes the cake, though; Clooney, Pitt, Damon, Roberts, Cheadle, Pacino, Zeta-Jones, Garcia...all must've been freakin' expensive.
Besides Samuel Jackson, what "A-list" star was listed above. Downey? Not anymore. Swank? She is not quite there yet. Norton? Maybe for the few months right after Fight Club. Besides, if they write it into their contract for the other movies then they might not have a choice. (See long drawn out fight over Aquaman 2 on Entourage.)
Spidey 4 and 5 in the Works?
Sequels may be shot back-to-back.
by Orlando Parfitt, IGN UK
UK, May 16, 2008 - Buzz on the Net is that Sony has been working Zodiac scribe James Vanderbilt like a proverbial dog on Spider-Man 4, with the scripter now having completed a working draft of the superhero sequel.
Cinnematical.com have reported the news, and, so their source claims: "The story arc has encompassed two films, making Spider-Man 5 shootable at the same time. The studio saw dollar signs and is in the process of reworking his deal to snatch up the story arc."
Interesting news indeed. At present it seems none of this is confirmed, and the studio certainly has a job gathering up the likes of Toby Maguire, Kirstin Dunst and Sam Raimi (if he chooses to don the directorial megaphone once again) together for a back-to-back shooting schedule.
How's this for an incentive though: 2007's Spider-Man 3, despite a mauling from many critics and fans, still made an estimated $800 million at the worldwide box office.
More news when we have it.
*dons bullet proof vest*
I find Maguire Mr. Lame-y Lamerston!
:lol:
I think he sucked in the 3rd movie for sure. Nothing about that was good imo. But as Peter Parker, he seems to have it down okay.
I think Mary Jane is a bad cast. She is looking more and more like a crank whore. :(
The only good thing about Spider Man 3 was Bryce Dallas Howard/Gwen Stacy...
:wub: :wub: :wub:
I don't think Spider-Man 3 was necessarily *bad*, but it was the weakest out of all three. I'm not too crazy about 4 + 5 either, unless they really do something new and fresh with the franchise.
I kind of liked Spider-Man 3 myself--the only problem as I saw it was that they were taking material that ought to have been spread out over the course of two movies that length and cramming it into one.
That plus the fact that they stretched out some parts too much and crammed others even further.... :P
But storywise I kind of liked it--besides being epic, I likedSpoiler: 05-17-2008 10:40 AMHeather19I still have yet to see the third one.