Fillipo, Hicks, Tony and David...WELCOME!!
Printable View
Fillipo, Hicks, Tony and David...WELCOME!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMOVED BY MODERATOR
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO SPAM - Simply report it using the tools provided and it will be removed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPAM... this girl has a lot of Boyfriends lol...
Welcome! That avatar is disturbing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt Puke
WELCOME!!
Not as disturbing as the screen name!
Perhaps not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon
Welcome to all newbies!
Welcome one and all...
Hi there! Was looking for somewhere to palaver awhile about the Dark Tower and all its mysteries.
You're in the right place. Welcome, GSTB!
Thanks!
You are well met my cousin from the north.Quote:
Originally Posted by GodSaveTheBeans
Welcome, Beans!
My English neighbour, it is good to see you.
Thankee Sai!
Welcome Beans!!!
I'm glad I finally discovered this place. I think I'll kick up my feet and stay awhile.
Welcome, Eric!
Welcome, Eric!
hello everyone
Welcome, Burger!Quote:
Originally Posted by burgerhicks80
thank you!
Only been here a few days and already bought my first signed King book from a user here. Yay!!
Congrats on your Full Dark! Sharp looking book.Quote:
Originally Posted by GenericEric
seeking: anything DT related #246
For those who expressed an interest in my article about King's dissatisfaction with Stanley Kubrick's version of The Shining, I am pleased to announce it's been published today and you can read it here: http://sensesofcinema.com/2020/the-s...igins-of-evil/
I tried to be as exhaustive as I could, with thanks to a few members of this community who helped me trace some of the rarest King's essay on his book. I'd appreciate a feedback, from you King experts. Thank you very much and happy reading.
This is a fantastic piece! I did not know about Kubrick's take on the spiritual afterlife and hearing King's thoughts on it, I agree that that may have derailed the entire movie. Jack is never sympathetic character in the book, has no arc, and is even denied the redemption at the end of the film that makes the ending of the book so good. Using the lens King has would have made for a much better movie, if done right. I still enjoy many aspects of the movie, but less so the more I notice the things that are off, in general, largely from that lack of thought throughout about the ghosts and the creation through that lens. I loved reading about King's explanation of the Wendy finding JAck's MS scene and how Kubrick missed the payoff...big time! This was very well researched and done! Thanks for sharing!