General Television Discussion

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-01-2015 02:03 PM
Merlin1958

Quote:

Originally Posted by webstar1000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bev Vincent

Re NARCOS: Can history be a spoiler? Just in case:

Spoiler:

Escobar lived for over a year after his escape from "prison" -- from July '92 to December '93.

Not only that... it was a VERY EXCITING TIME during this run.... will make a great final season!

As I am aware. What I was alluding to is the pace that they seem to be on in telling, Pablo's story at least, for season one. I know "season two" is a done deal, but it seems to me that a second season will do it for his story. Seeing how the series has been successful I was wondering if there had been any info released on what the writer's/producer's plans are for the story in season two and beyond if, in fact they intend to look into a season 3/4/5. Will the story pace slow down? Sprinkle in FB's? Or, perhaps move on to other Latin drug figures?

It just seems to me that the writers/producers produced the first season unsure whether it would be a hit or not and may be re-thinking their tact now that the show has done well. Just an impression I got from watching the first season is all and I was curious as to whether any info had been leaked or announced.
10-01-2015 05:27 PM
Mattrick

The moment near the end of South Park last night when

Spoiler:

Kenny gave his sister that doll that he bought with what little money he made

caught me off guard. I was not expecting such a tender moment. Ain't gonna lie, I teared up. It was beautiful.
10-01-2015 05:46 PM
Merlin1958

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

The moment near the end of South Park last night when

Spoiler:

Kenny gave his sister that doll that he bought with what little money he made

caught me off guard. I was not expecting such a tender moment. Ain't gonna lie, I teared up. It was beautiful.

Oh, you big ol' ball of mush, you!!! LOL LOL
10-01-2015 07:15 PM
Still Servant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

The moment near the end of South Park last night when

Spoiler:

Kenny gave his sister that doll that he bought with what little money he made

caught me off guard. I was not expecting such a tender moment. Ain't gonna lie, I teared up. It was beautiful.

Me too! That was a rare heartfelt moment from South Park. They really are pulling out everything in their bag of tricks this year.
10-02-2015 06:48 AM
Ricky

I watched Quantico last night and really, really enjoyed it. Super fast paced and twisty. I was on the fence about it over the summer but am glad I watched it. I thought Blindspot would end up being my favorite new fall show, but Quantico may end up taking that spot.
10-02-2015 07:22 AM
webstar1000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

I watched Quantico last night and really, really enjoyed it. Super fast paced and twisty. I was on the fence about it over the summer but am glad I watched it. I thought Blindspot would end up being my favorite new fall show, but Quantico may end up taking that spot.

Interesting.. I thought the same. I did still enjoy the 2nd Blindspot more BUT am looking forward to the second Quantico... Loving the twists although I hope it doesn't become impossible to follow if you know what I mean..
10-02-2015 08:27 AM
Ricky

Yeah, I'm still enjoying Blindspot but my attention kind of wavered with episode two. I just hope it doesn't get too procedural (unless all the cases are linked to Jane).
10-02-2015 12:53 PM
Still Servant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

I watched Quantico last night and really, really enjoyed it. Super fast paced and twisty. I was on the fence about it over the summer but am glad I watched it. I thought Blindspot would end up being my favorite new fall show, but Quantico may end up taking that spot.

Agreed. I really enjoyed Quantico. I wish they could have saved a few of those twists for later episodes though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

Yeah, I'm still enjoying Blindspot but my attention kind of wavered with episode two. I just hope it doesn't get too procedural (unless all the cases are linked to Jane).

I'm hoping it doesn't get too procedural too. I understand that's the bread and butter of most network shows, but that's usually where they start losing me. I do think the reveal in episode 2 might end up being really interesting.
10-02-2015 03:35 PM
Mattrick

Both Quantico and Blindspot just scream out that they will run out of steam and throw all their good ideas and twists out early and then peter off quickly. That's why I have trouble getting involved in new shows. So many go off the rails before they've cleared the first station. They come out with a cool premise that doesn't have much legs.
10-02-2015 03:53 PM
webstar1000

100% right.
10-06-2015 07:22 AM
mae

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gax3tMYU4I
10-09-2015 06:02 AM
mae

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u44m4cWAsCY
10-09-2015 12:57 PM
Jon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

Both Quantico and Blindspot just scream out that they will run out of steam and throw all their good ideas and twists out early and then peter off quickly. That's why I have trouble getting involved in new shows. So many go off the rails before they've cleared the first station. They come out with a cool premise that doesn't have much legs.

Which is why soooo many series should just be movies or mini series.
10-09-2015 01:26 PM
Still Servant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

Both Quantico and Blindspot just scream out that they will run out of steam and throw all their good ideas and twists out early and then peter off quickly. That's why I have trouble getting involved in new shows. So many go off the rails before they've cleared the first station. They come out with a cool premise that doesn't have much legs.

Which is why soooo many series should just be movies or mini series.

I think a show like Quantico, which I'm really enjoying, will be able to sustain it at least for a full season. It's usually season 2 of shows like that where they start running into trouble.

A show like How to Get Away with Murder was able to keep things fresh for the first season. Then again it was only 15 episodes. I honestly feel that's a good number for any type of show. I know the old standard is 22 episodes, but so many shows just can't sustain that. Especially procedural shows, which I end up getting bored with fairly quickly.
10-09-2015 01:56 PM
Ricky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Servant

Then again it was only 15 episodes. I honestly feel that's a good number for any type of show. I know the old standard is 22 episodes, but so many shows just can't sustain that.

I agree 100%. When I first started watching some shows on Showtime and HBO that's when I realized how good shows can be (and no filler) when they're only 12 or 13 episodes.
10-09-2015 03:01 PM
fernandito

Yup. 12 or 13 episodes a season is the sweet spot.
10-09-2015 03:52 PM
Mattrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Servant

Then again it was only 15 episodes. I honestly feel that's a good number for any type of show. I know the old standard is 22 episodes, but so many shows just can't sustain that.

I agree 100%. When I first started watching some shows on Showtime and HBO that's when I realized how good shows can be (and no filler) when they're only 12 or 13 episodes.

Those shows also tend to be around 50 minutes. Six Feet Under was usually around 55 minutes an episode. Lost really changed with the times, from the techically 25 episode first season to dropping down to 17 episodes really helped the last few seasons...funny thing is that Season Three had the most filler episodes but it was also my favourite.
10-09-2015 06:54 PM
Shannon

LOST HAS NO FILLER EPISODES!

I WILL MUUURRDDDEERRR YOOUUUUU!

:)
10-09-2015 08:20 PM
Mattrick

That's not what most people say lol.

Watched an episode of Heroes: Reborn with my dad. I like it less than the original series, which is to say I hate it. Hopefully the next series is Heroes: Reburied.
10-09-2015 09:11 PM
Shannon

WELL MOST PEOPLE CAN BURN IN HELL!

AND I HOPE THEIR FACES EXPLODE WITH THE FURY OF A THOUSAND SUNS IN A MICROWAVE LOCATED IN THE BREAKROOM OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT!
10-09-2015 10:04 PM
Still Servant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Servant

Then again it was only 15 episodes. I honestly feel that's a good number for any type of show. I know the old standard is 22 episodes, but so many shows just can't sustain that.

I agree 100%. When I first started watching some shows on Showtime and HBO that's when I realized how good shows can be (and no filler) when they're only 12 or 13 episodes.

Those shows also tend to be around 50 minutes. Six Feet Under was usually around 55 minutes an episode. Lost really changed with the times, from the techically 25 episode first season to dropping down to 17 episodes really helped the last few seasons...funny thing is that Season Three had the most filler episodes but it was also my favourite.

Yeah, it's a little different for HBO and Showtime. They don't have to deal with commercials so their episodes are a full 50 or so minutes, whereas shows on network TV boil down to about 42 minutes once you take out the commercials. It really is a huge advantage for shows without commercials. They don't have to worry about losing the audience's attention or losing momentum.
10-10-2015 06:54 AM
Mattrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Servant

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ricky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Still Servant

Then again it was only 15 episodes. I honestly feel that's a good number for any type of show. I know the old standard is 22 episodes, but so many shows just can't sustain that.

I agree 100%. When I first started watching some shows on Showtime and HBO that's when I realized how good shows can be (and no filler) when they're only 12 or 13 episodes.

Those shows also tend to be around 50 minutes. Six Feet Under was usually around 55 minutes an episode. Lost really changed with the times, from the techically 25 episode first season to dropping down to 17 episodes really helped the last few seasons...funny thing is that Season Three had the most filler episodes but it was also my favourite.

Yeah, it's a little different for HBO and Showtime. They don't have to deal with commercials so their episodes are a full 50 or so minutes, whereas shows on network TV boil down to about 42 minutes once you take out the commercials. It really is a huge advantage for shows without commercials. They don't have to worry about losing the audience's attention or losing momentum.

The difference between plotting the episodes is huge. On network TV they build up to Each commercial break.with mini cliffhangers so no one changes the channel, which, to me, often hurts the product. Maybe not too much, but it can make a show seem cheesier.
10-10-2015 09:09 AM
webstar1000

If networks were smart... They would make shows that continue episode to episode one or two season MAX..... Then people would be on to it and stick with them... Soon as they see ratings... And extend the show... They always end up goin to shit!
10-10-2015 10:16 AM
Mattrick

Quote:

Originally Posted by webstar1000

If networks were smart... They would make shows that continue episode to episode one or two season MAX..... Then people would be on to it and stick with them... Soon as they see ratings... And extend the show... They always end up goin to shit!

More one-off shows would be great. Give me a solid ten episode series and end it. I think Walking Dead would benefit from this approach. Run a one season spin off that sets up a future plotline or a future villain. How awesome would have a short series on Terminus before season five have been? Or go the True Detective route where you tell isolated stories with new characters and new location each season. Even shows that start strong like Prison Break and True Blood and then go off the rails right after. I don't invest in new shows very often because of it.
10-10-2015 12:12 PM
Ricky

What I don't understand about networks is when they cancel a show, it's done forever...until they decide to revive it years later (X-Files, Heroes, etc.). I think it would make more sense (and infuriate audiences less) if they would just say something along the lines of "we're ending it for now, but may decide to do another season at another time" rather than say it's ending for good. More of taking a "break" with a show rather than cancelling it altogether.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page