Thanks everyone. But I just realized that the second picture that was sent to me doesn't match the first one. The background behind the sig isn't the same. Now I have to ask the seller again which is the right signature for this book - the one posted on Abe or the one she sent me. Ugh! Either she's being deceptive or grabbed a different book by mistake.
Beware, this guy is a horrible fraudster on EBay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Firestarter-...AAAOSwdU1W-YFP
Mulleins
I like the second one better. The first is hard to see and looks a bit strange.
They are certainly different signatures in different books.
That's the asshole who was mad about me giving him negative feedback for a forged signature. (I knew it was a forgery when I bought it.) In retaliation he bought a cheap cookbook from me, and he immediately gave me malicious negative feedback. I called and eBay said they would remove it. They did remove it for a couple of weeks. The negative rep then reappeared. I noticed and called, but they said they wouldn't remove it. They said to wait for the year to expire for it to go away. eBay loves forgers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Room 217 Caretaker
I have since blocked the buyer.
How can someone have a 100% positive feedback score when one of the reviews is negative?Quote:
Originally Posted by Room 217 Caretaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyHow can someone have a 100% positive feedback score when one of the reviews is negative?Quote:
Originally Posted by Room 217 Caretaker
That is the negative feedback I left him.
I have a theory. If you go to his feedback page and scroll over [How is feedback percentage calculated?] it states that there is no negative feedback. I think that one part of the system has cleared the negative feedback and another has not. Negative feedback should disappear after one year. It's been about a year since I left that feedback.
I notice he doesn't say who the book is signed by.
I guess we should give the guy a break, he's from Flint Michigan and he drinks the water.
Mulleins
Thanks, I needed that laugh. :emot-roflolmao:Quote:
Originally Posted by Room 217 Caretaker
I'll be in Lansing soon. Perhaps I should stop by. :orely:Quote:
Originally Posted by Room 217 Caretaker
I got hm to post pictures of the signature. As suspected, it's a terrible forged copy.
Soon, someone will be parted with their hard earned money. On the bright side, if the buyer pulls out each page and tightly twists them the buyer will have a bunch of fire starters to stay warm by during the winter.
Mulleins
I question if the sig is from "THE" SK:
American Author Stephen King, Signed Autographed Check, Signed By The Author!
I agree with RF. Not convinced this is THE Stephen King.Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Flagg
If anyone is wondering if canceled King checks are out there...I can say yes. Go to my Collection Thread (page 13) and scroll down to the check:
http://www.thedarktower.org/palaver/...retaker/page13
Mulleins
Hi team. Thoughts on this? I'm not a fan but always like to check with the group. Thanks.
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f2...psp88xer09.jpg
:nope:
:nope:
Looks fine to me.
If it wasn't resellers I might not be suspicious. Except that it is inscribed "To" instead of "For."Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Flagg
This^. I think its fine but then i realized the seller so suspicion set it. I still think its goodQuote:
Originally Posted by Br!anIf it wasn't resellers I might not be suspicious. Except that it is inscribed "To" instead of "For."Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Flagg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimimck
Legit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Br!an
Most of the inscriptions I've seen start with "For", but there are many that start with "To".Quote:
Originally Posted by Br!anIf it wasn't resellers I might not be suspicious. Except that it is inscribed "To" instead of "For."Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Flagg
That Firestarter looks like a nice 1980s sig and inscription. The line across the top of the inscription is odd. The book is also over priced IMHO :smile:
edit: corrected "resellers" to "rwsellers"Quote:
Originally Posted by Br!anIf it wasn't rwsellers I might not be suspicious. Except that it is inscribed "To" instead of "For."Quote:
Originally Posted by Randall Flagg