View Full Version : BMCOAT - TIE BREAKER! Round 1, Group I
fernandito
08-23-2009, 05:05 AM
Henry II (The Lion in Winter)
http://www.thedarktower.org/gallery/data/562/Henry_II.JPG
Dracula (Dracula - 1931)
http://i699.photobucket.com/albums/vv360/heather1019/board%20pics/BMCOAT/image2135155g.jpg
candy
08-23-2009, 05:18 AM
dr acu laaa ha ha ha (oh my word that sounds more like the count from sesame street)
Woofer
08-23-2009, 09:04 AM
Henry, of course
I have to agree (you knew I would). :couple:
Brice
08-23-2009, 09:31 AM
alucard
Henry, of course
I have to agree (you knew I would). :couple:
Bears wonder who the third nerd could be - there are three votes
flaggwalkstheline
08-24-2009, 06:27 AM
voted for dracula but I would like to make it known that I consider Christopher Lee to be a far better dracula than bela
cozener
08-24-2009, 09:24 AM
Lots of Draculas are better than Bela. I think its more about the character and the impact that character had. Bela was just a vehicle. Because of that I voted Dracula too. As much of a fan I am of Lion in Winter and Peter O'Toole I can't deny the fact that most people have never heard of that movie whereas Dracula is iconic.
Actually, I'm a little ashamed that I didn't offer up Peter O'Toole's TE Lawrence as one of the greatest movie characters.
Actually, I'm a little ashamed that I didn't offer up Peter O'Toole's TE Lawrence as one of the greatest movie characters.
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k291/mishemplushem/Facilitation/bear_shocked.gif
neither did I! shame on us
better luck next year
Woofer
08-24-2009, 11:05 AM
I think characters with single films are stronger because there is less of a chance of their becoming a parody of themselves. There are many nominations here that I loved in the first movie, but sequels made me ignore them. I had to consider the character as a whole.
pathoftheturtle
08-25-2009, 06:36 AM
With Dracula, I've never even really cared for the novel.
I do think that a case could be made that, since having "a deep impact on cinema as a whole" was one of the criteria which feev originally set forth, a character with a high enough high point may still qualify when taken as a whole, even if it is one that has many low points.
Woofer
08-25-2009, 01:09 PM
With Dracula, I've never even really cared for the novel.
I do think that a case could be made that, since having "a deep impact on cinema as a whole" was one of the criteria which feev originally set forth, a character with a high enough high point may still qualify when taken as a whole, even if it is one that has many low points.
I would consider those many, many low points as part of the impact since an impact can be positive or negative.
<---super duper massively hardcore horror fan
fernandito
09-04-2009, 04:26 PM
Dracula advances!
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.8 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.